Problem: Some Web3 RPC Handlers could panic

[yihuang]

Description

Closes: #701

Solution:

• return error rather than panic when decoding invalid tx

---

For contributor use:

• Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
• Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
• Code follows the module structure standards.
• Wrote unit and integration tests
• Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
• Added relevant godoc comments.
• Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
• Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer

---

For admin use:

• Added appropriate labels to PR (ex. WIP, R4R, docs, etc)
• Reviewers assigned
• Squashed all commits, uses message "Merge pull request #XYZ: [title]" (coding standards)

[yihuang]

With this patch, the response of the tx mentioned in issue is:

{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"error":{"code":-32000,"message":"SafeNewIntFromBigInt() out of bound"}}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #702 (190b041) into main (08a8191) will decrease coverage by 0.24%.
The diff coverage is 53.78%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #702      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   57.36%   57.11%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files          63       63              
  Lines        5505     5557      +52     
==========================================
+ Hits         3158     3174      +16     
- Misses       2180     2201      +21     
- Partials      167      182      +15     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
rpc/ethereum/types/utils.go	0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/evm/types/errors.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
x/evm/types/dynamic_fee_tx.go	78.61% <19.23%> (-11.07%)	⬇️
x/evm/types/access_list_tx.go	68.91% <21.05%> (-6.64%)	⬇️
server/config/config.go	21.48% <36.36%> (-0.12%)	⬇️
encoding/config.go	88.09% <40.00%> (-6.91%)	⬇️
x/evm/types/legacy_tx.go	95.20% <68.42%> (-4.80%)	⬇️
x/evm/types/msg.go	70.86% <87.50%> (-0.09%)	⬇️
x/evm/types/tx_data.go	85.41% <87.50%> (+1.32%)	⬆️
x/evm/types/chain_config.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 7 more

[tomtau]

looks all right -- there are also a few direct calls in the RPC handlers themselves, e.g.: https:/yihuang/ethermint/blob/invalid-tx/rpc/ethereum/namespaces/eth/api.go#L487
are those safe?

[yihuang]

looks all right -- there are also a few direct calls in the RPC handlers themselves, e.g.: https:/yihuang/ethermint/blob/invalid-tx/rpc/ethereum/namespaces/eth/api.go#L487 are those safe?

it seems not, the fee is gasPrice * gasLimit, so it could still overflow the 256bits. I guess we can check this in ValidateBasic.

[fedekunze]

ACK. Can you add a changelog entry?

[yihuang]

ACK. Can you add a changelog entry?

done, also added validations into the Validate methods, and unit test cases.