-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Invalid lemma for had
contraction
#5373
Comments
Thanks for the report! This is coming from a rule (in the tokenizer exceptions) that assigns the lemma/tag |
This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs. |
I'm not sure if this issue is in scope of this project, since as far as I know it's only possible to figure if the
'd
contraction is actuallyhad
orwould
from the context of the sentence, but most of the time spaCy seems to work with contractions as expected and it would be nice to be able to rely on it.How to reproduce the behaviour
The result I'd expect to print is
have
instead ofwould
.Your Environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: