Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

💫 Fix issue #3839: Incorrect entity IDs from Matcher with operators #3949

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 11, 2019

Conversation

honnibal
Copy link
Member

This was another bug where the Matcher could return an incorrect entity ID. I had hoped it was an out-of-bounds access as that could have explained some memory errors, but it seems that isn't the case -- so I think the memory errors are probably a different bug.

  • I have submitted the spaCy Contributor Agreement.
  • I ran the tests, and all new and existing tests passed.
  • My changes don't require a change to the documentation, or if they do, I've added all required information.

@honnibal honnibal changed the title Fix issue #3839 Fix issue #3839: Incorrect entity IDs from Matcher with operators Jul 11, 2019
@ines ines changed the title Fix issue #3839: Incorrect entity IDs from Matcher with operators 💫 Fix issue #3839: Incorrect entity IDs from Matcher with operators Jul 11, 2019
@ines ines added bug Bugs and behaviour differing from documentation feat / matcher Feature: Token, phrase and dependency matcher labels Jul 11, 2019
@honnibal honnibal merged commit b40b4c2 into master Jul 11, 2019
polm pushed a commit to polm/spaCy that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2019
…erators (explosion#3949)

* Add regression test for issue explosion#3541

* Add comment on bugfix

* Remove incorrect test

* Un-xfail test
@ines ines deleted the bugfix/matcher-oob branch September 19, 2019 11:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Bugs and behaviour differing from documentation feat / matcher Feature: Token, phrase and dependency matcher
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants