Decouple RateLimiter
burst size and refill period
#12379
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When the rate limiter does not have any waiting requests, the first request to arrive may consume all of the available bandwidth, despite potentially having lower priority than requests that arrive later in the same refill interval. Then, those higher priority requests must wait for a refill. So even in scenarios in which we have an overall bandwidth surplus, the highest priority requests can be sporadically delayed up to a whole refill period.
Alone, this isn't necessarily problematic as the refill period is configurable via
refill_period_us
and can be tuned down as needed until the max sporadic delay is tolerable. However, tuning downrefill_period_us
had a side effect of reducing burst size. Some users require a certain burst size to issue optimal I/O sizes to the underlying storage system.To satisfy those users, this PR decouples the refill period from the burst size. That way, the max sporadic delay can be limited without impacting I/O sizes issued to the underlying storage system.
Test Plan:
The goal is to show we can now limit the max sporadic delay without impacting compaction's I/O size.
The benchmark runs compaction with a large I/O size, while user reads simultaneously run at a low rate that does not consume all of the available bandwidth. The max sporadic delay is measured using the P100 of rocksdb.file.read.get.micros. I just used strace to verify the compaction reads follow
rate_limiter_single_burst_bytes
Setup:
./db_bench -benchmarks=fillrandom,flush -write_buffer_size=67108864 -disable_auto_compactions=true -value_size=256 -num=1048576
Benchmark:
./db_bench -benchmarks=readrandom -use_existing_db=true -num=1048576 -duration=10 -benchmark_read_rate_limit=4096 -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=67108864 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=$refill_micros -rate_limiter_single_burst_bytes=16777216 -rate_limit_bg_reads=true -rate_limit_user_ops=true -statistics=true -cache_size=0 -stats_level=5 -compaction_readahead_size=16777216 -use_direct_reads=true
Results:
For verifying compaction read sizes:
strace -fye pread64 ./db_bench -benchmarks=compact -use_existing_db=true -rate_limiter_bytes_per_sec=67108864 -rate_limiter_refill_period_us=$refill_micros -rate_limiter_single_burst_bytes=16777216 -rate_limit_bg_reads=true -compaction_readahead_size=16777216 -use_direct_reads=true