Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is the training procedure result normal? Masked regions do not improve and appear to be random noise. #190

Open
junzhin opened this issue Feb 8, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@junzhin
Copy link

junzhin commented Feb 8, 2024

Hello,

thank you for the great work and the great repo.

I attempted to reproduce the pre-training of MAE-ViT-Large, and performed 68 epochs on a chest x -rays dataset with about 300 k medical images, and the loss stopped improving when it reached around 0.0045 loss without pixlossnorm. Additionally, the reconstruction results fail to predict the masked regions correctly.

image

Could you suggest a reason for that? Any idea why this is the case?

@CristoJV
Copy link

CristoJV commented Mar 25, 2024

Hi @junzhin,

I'm facing the same errors. output
Pretrained on 500k faces for 20 epochs, resuming from the authors' pretrained version MAE-ViT-Base.

Did you manage to solve them?

EDIT: I fixed it by disabling the pixlossnorm.

Thank you!

@ats4869
Copy link

ats4869 commented May 18, 2024

I would like to ask how you use finetune to train the reconstruction model on your own data set. I see that through main_finetune.py only models for classification tasks can be generated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants