-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Official Fatiando Mastodon account? #75
Comments
I would love to have a Mastodon account for Fatiando. I know I'm not the most diligent community manager and it's very likely that I'm not going to be the one that have more toots through it. So I'm in favour, but only if it's not a huge load on the rest of the team. Regarding the instance, I think Fosstodon sounds good. It's sad that they only support English, but they allow exceptions:
Source: https://hub.fosstodon.org/why-fosstodon-is-english-only/ So I don't think we will have any issue if we toot in English and add a reply with a translation or even if we interact with other people in different languages through replies. Another option would be https://floss.social. But they have way less active users so probably an account in Fosstodon will draw more attention. I'm just mentioning for the record. |
I don't have an account in mastodon. I know about them for @santisoler. About the instance... I don't know! Most of our interactions through Fatiando are in English |
I'm so lost on an Island that I barely have an idea of what is going on. I can see Mastodon as a trending topic and newspapers highlighted massive migration from Twitter. I would ask these: Which are the "principles", "morals", "ethics ", and "values ", that Fatiando represents? Then yes. Absolutely yes. Even if is more work. In this scenario, the Twitter account will be closed? When? |
Thanks for the great points, everyone! I like the plan of sticking with fosstodon, posting in English, and perhaps replying in other languages. We could always post the main Fatiando account in English and share from our personal accounts in other languages (even in language specific servers, like @santisoler has).
That’s a great question, @MGomezN. I think we all know intrinsically what those are but we’ve never really got them all in writing. We definitely should and it should be widely advertised on our website. Would you mind opening an issue in this repository about putting these things in writing somewhere (I want you to have the credit for the suggestion 🙂)?
Perhaps not explicitly. At least not yet. So maybe we don’t need to shut that account down just now. Even if a platform is bad we can still use it for good to promote our project and values and attract people to the light of open-everything. At least that’s how I feel about things like ResearchGate and LinkedIn.
It shouldn’t really be much more work. We don’t post that regularly and just tend to post the same thing on all platforms. Alright, I’ll make an account on fosstodon and share the log in with whoever wants to give it a try. That then reminds me to write down some instructions for sharing passwords and keeping accounts secure. |
Alright, requested an invite to fosstodon.org with the user name |
Adding to @leouieda:
I like to read (and listen) to what Cory Doctorow thinks about this not-so-benevolent social media. Even if we don't like them because they are centralized, they have shady ways of show your feed, have ads, are run by billionares, etc (pick your rant), they still are a public space in dispute. Yes, they are walled gardens, but there are also people in there having social interactions, and this is not going to go away just because the company behind it is bad. I would love to see science to migrate to an open media (like Mastodon), but I still think we can have a good use of the mainstream closed ones to promote the things we care about. Otherwise we will live inside our echo chamber, completely isolated from the rest of the world. As Cory puts it: the main problem with these monopolistic platforms is they put a very high switching cost. If you are not longer comfortable in that platform you could move to another one, but you leave all your interactions behind. There's no way to make a Twitter user to get a post from someone from another platform, therefore if you want Twitter users to read your content you need to have a Twitter account. With Mastodon this is different: it relies on an open protocol that offers no obstacle to read content from other users. You could use any software that uses that protocol (Mastodon is just one of them), publish content and we in Mastodon will be able to read it and interact with you. Plus you could choose the Mastodon server that better suits you need or even run your own if you like it. Cory fights for legislation that would force these big monopolies to have interoperability (we could interoperate between the different social media) in order to lower the switching cost and also make the market more competitive and not ruled by just five Nazgul. In conclusion, I think we should keep the Twitter account for now, but I would love to promote Mastodon through it. |
Well, since it actually happened and a lot of people are leaving twitter should we create a Fatiando Mastodon account? Like with LinkedIn, we would mostly post the same things on all our social media so it's not that much more work.
Possible server is: https://fosstodon.org/about/more Only problem is that they only allow toots in English because of moderation. We don't really post much in other languages so maybe it's not a big issue. Or it is and we can look for another server (suggestions welcome).
cc @santisoler @MGomezN @aguspesce
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: