You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Expression grouping was removed in 2f3e5f4 because it didn't work very well and was a serious performance burden for Jison.
I believe in general, correct operator grouping is not possible because one has to infer some semantics from the TeX source , especially when fences are involved like in y = { [0,1) ; (2,3] }^2.
However, I think it would still be possible to improve the grouping via operator precedence:
do this in newMrow instead of relying on the grammar's operator precedence
only do this for a restricted set of operators like unary/binary operators and relations.
fences should not be involved or only at the beginning and end of the mrow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See http://www.w3.org/Math/MathML3/chapter3.html#id.3.3.1.3 for a discussion of grouping of sub-expressions.
Expression grouping was removed in 2f3e5f4 because it didn't work very well and was a serious performance burden for Jison.
I believe in general, correct operator grouping is not possible because one has to infer some semantics from the TeX source , especially when fences are involved like in y = { [0,1) ; (2,3] }^2.
However, I think it would still be possible to improve the grouping via operator precedence:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: