Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve layer validation for printing, excluding those not able to print in the target projection #7748

Closed
1 of 6 tasks
mbarto opened this issue Jan 18, 2022 · 0 comments
Closed
1 of 6 tasks

Comments

@mbarto
Copy link
Contributor

mbarto commented Jan 18, 2022

Description

Currently we only exclude google / bings layers. Other ones have issues (e.g. OSM), so we should properly check and exclude them for printing as needed.

What kind of improvement you want to add? (check one with "x", remove the others)

  • Minor changes to existing features
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Other useful information

@mbarto mbarto added this to the 2022.01.00 milestone Jan 18, 2022
@mbarto mbarto self-assigned this Jan 18, 2022
mbarto added a commit to mbarto/MapStore2 that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2022
mbarto added a commit to mbarto/MapStore2 that referenced this issue Jan 25, 2022
mbarto added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2022
* #7747: fixed reprojection of vector layers when using the PrintProjection plugin

* #7759: enable osm and tileprovider layers usage as backgrounds with custom crs

* #7748: fixed and improved handling of default background when using a custom projection
@tdipisa tdipisa added tmp and removed tmp labels Feb 11, 2022
@tdipisa tdipisa added the Print label Mar 7, 2022
@tdipisa tdipisa removed this from the 2022.01.00 milestone Mar 17, 2022
@ElenaGallo ElenaGallo self-assigned this Mar 25, 2022
@offtherailz offtherailz added this to the v2022.02.00 milestone Sep 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants