Fix #10112 Review class name for symbolizer field #10286
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
allyoucanmap
added
the
BackportNeeded
dsuren1
approved these changes
May 8, 2024
|
@ElenaGallo Kindly test it in DEV and let us know if it can be backported. Thanks! |
|
Test passed, @allyoucanmap please backport to 2024.01.xx. Thanks |
allyoucanmap
added a commit
to allyoucanmap/MapStore2
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2024
allyoucanmap
removed
the
BackportNeeded
tdipisa
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 29, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR review style class name for symbolizer field to avoid what reported in this comment #10118 (comment)
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x", remove the others)
Issue
What is the current behavior?
#10112
What is the new behavior?
Mark symbolizer has correct background syule
Breaking change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x", remove the other)
Other useful information