ref(scope): Remove apparently unnecessary if
#3298
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The removed `if` statement is identical to the `if` statement immediately before. It does not seem that the code before the second `if` can modify `transaction.sampled`, so it should be safe to combine the two `if` blocks into a single block under the first `if` statement.
sentrivana
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2024
arjennienhuis
pushed a commit
to arjennienhuis/sentry-python
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 30, 2024
The removed `if` statement is identical to the `if` statement immediately before. It does not seem that the code before the second `if` can modify `transaction.sampled`, so it should be safe to combine the two `if` blocks into a single block under the first `if` statement.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The removed
ifstatement is identical to theifstatement immediately before. It does not seem that the code before the secondifcan modifytransaction.sampled, so it should be safe to combine the twoifblocks into a single block under the firstifstatement.