-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FLAC Extension doesn't play high sample rate files (for example 192khz) #3769
Labels
Comments
Denis55ka
changed the title
FLAC Extension doesn't play high sample rate files (for exemple 192khz)
FLAC Extension doesn't play high sample rate files (for example 192khz)
Jan 30, 2018
Thanks for reporting this. I'll look into this but not likely to be soon. |
@botaydotcom - This looks extractor related (probably just need to add support for the extra sample rate). |
ojw28
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2018
Also add testing media to verify FLAC extension can play these sample rates. Github: #3769. ------------- Created by MOE: https:/google/moe MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=192783193
This issue is fixed in the referenced commit. Please help us to check whether it works for you using the dev-v2 branch. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Issue description
FLAC Extension doesn't play audio with high sample rate (for example 192khz). It throws with exception E/FLACParser: unsupported sample rate 192000
Version of ExoPlayer being used
2.6.1
Device(s) and version(s) of Android being used
Xiaomi Mi5
A full bug report captured from the device
E/FLACParser: unsupported sample rate 192000
E/FLACParser: unsupported sample rate 192000
E/ExoPlayerImplInternal: Source error.
java.io.IOException: Metadata decoding failed
at com.google.android.exoplayer2.ext.flac.FlacExtractor.read(FlacExtractor.java:98)
at com.google.android.exoplayer2.source.ExtractorMediaPeriod$ExtractingLoadable.load(ExtractorMediaPeriod.java:749)
at com.google.android.exoplayer2.upstream.Loader$LoadTask.run(Loader.java:315)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1133)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:607)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:760)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: