Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HTML partial support #890

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

HTML partial support #890

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

k0ff33
Copy link

@k0ff33 k0ff33 commented Sep 9, 2016

As mentioned in #889, provides a basic ability to separate big and ugly html files into smaller partials, without adding any complicated template engine.

Gulp will now scan default @@tags in html files and replace those with
content of included files

To follow the live-reloading functionality, html files are now watched
and compiled to the .tmp folder
The proposed structure is based on the components from material design
lite.

*basic.html is intentionally left untouched
Written a tiny description of included changes.
@googlebot
Copy link

Thanks for your pull request. It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please visit https://cla.developers.google.com/ to sign.

Once you've signed, please reply here (e.g. I signed it!) and we'll verify. Thanks.


  • If you've already signed a CLA, it's possible we don't have your GitHub username or you're using a different email address. Check your existing CLA data and verify that your email is set on your git commits.
  • If you signed the CLA as a corporation, please let us know the company's name.

@k0ff33
Copy link
Author

k0ff33 commented Sep 9, 2016

I signed it!

@googlebot
Copy link

CLAs look good, thanks!

@googlebot googlebot added cla: yes and removed cla: no labels Sep 9, 2016
@JimmyMultani
Copy link

Any news on this?

@Victory
Copy link

Victory commented Mar 13, 2017

I pulled these changes into my project and it worked a charm.

+1 to add this to main branch.

@sbarfurth
Copy link

I would like to suggest that instead of constraining partials into a folder, they could instead be prefixed with an underscore. This would leave more room with folder structure and seems compliant with what is usually done with Sass.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants