Add lossless option for saving webp #208
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@mikestead yeah, it would be great supporting all of them. WebP usage is increasing and will be common users need more customizacion levels. |
|
Thanks for the PR. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Surfacing option to save webp images in lossless mode.
Looking at libvips this param has been available for quite some time (7.38 I think) so didn't wrap it in a version conditional.
Just testing the water but if this looks ok I could have a go at surfacing some of the other webp options mentioned in #135 like
o.NearLosslesso.AlphaQualityo.SmartSubsampleand potentially
o.WebpPresetenumLet me know if that's ok, along with the naming, and I can give it a shot.