Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resource/aws_elasticache_replication_group: Add MultiAZ support #13909

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

resource/aws_elasticache_replication_group: Add MultiAZ support #13909

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

pcantea
Copy link
Contributor

@pcantea pcantea commented Jun 23, 2020

Closes #13706

Add multi_az_enabled parameter to aws_elasticache_replication_group

Community Note

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Closes #13706

Release note for CHANGELOG:

resource/aws_elasticache_replication_group: Add `multi_az` argument 

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccXXX'

...

@ghost ghost added size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. service/elasticache Issues and PRs that pertain to the elasticache service. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Jun 23, 2020
@pcantea pcantea changed the title Closes #13706 Add MultiAZ support to AWS Elasticache Replication Group Jun 23, 2020
@ghost ghost added the documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. label Jun 23, 2020
@pcantea pcantea changed the title Add MultiAZ support to AWS Elasticache Replication Group resource/aws_elasticache_replication_group: Add MultiAZ support Jun 25, 2020
@pcantea pcantea marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2020 14:18
@pcantea pcantea requested a review from a team June 26, 2020 14:18
@sc250024
Copy link

Possible to get this merged please? 🙏

@Type1J
Copy link

Type1J commented Aug 6, 2020

Please assign a reviewer to this PR, and get this PR merged. I'm stuck with hacks until then that I've been having to defend in code reviews.

@ankithriday
Copy link

Need this merged, don't want to have to do the provisioner workaround

@ppapishe
Copy link

hope this gets merged soon so that we do not have to use in-efficient workarounds

@bflad bflad added enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. and removed needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. labels Oct 31, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@bflad bflad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @goodspellar 👋 Apologies for the delayed review here and thank you for the contribution. Overall this is looking good.

This was going to be looked at next week as part of our freshly updated Roadmap, but to jump ahead and give you something actionable now -- it looks like the only thing might be to create new testing (functions and configurations) instead of modifying the existing testing. Copy-paste-modify if fine/encouraged. This helps us ensure there are no regressions with existing functionality before we release it.

Please reach out if you have any questions or do not have time to adjust this. Should hopefully be a quick merge after that change. 👍

@bflad bflad self-assigned this Oct 31, 2020
@pcantea pcantea requested a review from a team as a code owner December 8, 2020 17:48
@pcantea
Copy link
Contributor Author

pcantea commented Dec 8, 2020

@bflad Thanks for the review, sorry it took me so long to get around to it, I have some free time this week to work on this. I updated the TestAccAWSElasticacheReplicationGroup_multiAzInVpc test because, as the name implies, it tests multi-az support. I will create new tests for the other two I updated, however, for the first one would you still like me to create a new test or can I update the existing?

@metroshica
Copy link

Could we get a review on this? Seems like it's a pretty popular request.

@sc250024
Copy link

Seriously, almost 8 months now.

Base automatically changed from master to main January 23, 2021 00:58
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.26.0 milestone Jan 28, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 28, 2021

This has been released in version 3.26.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template for triage. Thanks!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 28, 2021

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 28, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. service/elasticache Issues and PRs that pertain to the elasticache service. size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Elasticache Redis Multi AZ not enabled
8 participants