You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am wondering if a better approach, given that these releases are not intended for public use but only for ghc, is to expand our use of devel release numbers: assuming that it's too late to fix this for 3.14, then
3.15.0.0 is the first devel version
3.15.1.0 would be the first for-ghc release
3.15.2.0 would be for continued development after the first for-ghc release
if needed, we could repeat this with 3.15.3.0/3.15.4.0 and so on.
This way we don't confuse our release numbers, which currently are on course for us to from a public release standpoint skip from 3.12.1.0 to 3.16.0.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That one would make sense, but I am under the impression that 3.14 in particular is only Cabal and only for use by the GHC developers, with no intended public/Hackage release at all.
I am wondering if a better approach, given that these releases are not intended for public use but only for ghc, is to expand our use of devel release numbers: assuming that it's too late to fix this for 3.14, then
This way we don't confuse our release numbers, which currently are on course for us to from a public release standpoint skip from 3.12.1.0 to 3.16.0.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: