Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(storybook): add PeerBandwidthTable.stories.js #2095

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jul 7, 2023

Conversation

SgtPooki
Copy link
Member

@SgtPooki SgtPooki commented Feb 9, 2023

Similar to #2094

adding storybook coverage to file with low coverage at https://app.codecov.io/gh/ipfs/ipfs-webui/tree/main/src/status

@alanshaw @hacdias @lidel @olizilla Do any of you know if this component was ever used? If so, was it removed purposefully?

It looks like this table is supposed to be surfaced inside the currently used peers table as a single column (see screenshot from #1616)

other related issues:

@SgtPooki SgtPooki requested a review from a team as a code owner February 9, 2023 00:33
@SgtPooki SgtPooki temporarily deployed to Deploy February 9, 2023 00:37 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@SgtPooki SgtPooki temporarily deployed to Deploy February 9, 2023 00:46 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

@whizzzkid whizzzkid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why call it a chore?

Not blocking this but that broken icon looks bad.

src/status/PeerBandwidthTable.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/status/PeerBandwidthTable.stories.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/status/PeerBandwidthTable.stories.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@whizzzkid whizzzkid temporarily deployed to Deploy February 9, 2023 04:46 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@SgtPooki
Copy link
Member Author

SgtPooki commented Feb 9, 2023

Why call it a chore?

I guess it's technically a test but wasnt required, isnt a fix, isnt a feat, and not docs..

Im fine with either.

Not blocking this but that broken icon looks bad.

Yea as mentioned in the description, this component doesn't seem to be used, so i think we could address later if the component is used? But i think the component has value either way as an example.. we could add a version of this to the status or peers page later and could address it then.

@SgtPooki SgtPooki temporarily deployed to Deploy March 13, 2023 21:02 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@SgtPooki SgtPooki temporarily deployed to Deploy June 9, 2023 19:21 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@SgtPooki SgtPooki temporarily deployed to Deploy June 12, 2023 18:29 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@SgtPooki SgtPooki changed the title chore: add PeerBandwidthTable.stories.js test(storybook): add PeerBandwidthTable.stories.js Jul 3, 2023
@SgtPooki SgtPooki temporarily deployed to Deploy July 3, 2023 21:05 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
@SgtPooki SgtPooki merged commit c969c5e into main Jul 7, 2023
18 checks passed
@SgtPooki SgtPooki deleted the chore/peer-bandwidth-table-story branch July 7, 2023 17:21
ipfs-gui-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2023
## [4.1.0](v4.0.2...v4.1.0) (2023-07-25)

 CID `bafybeieqdeoqkf7xf4aozd524qncgiloh33qgr25lyzrkusbcre4c3fxay`

 ---

### Features

* add 4EVERLAND to list of pinning service providers ([#2107](#2107)) ([12a0f87](12a0f87))

### Bug Fixes

* **ci:** e2e coverage ([#2142](#2142)) ([83353e0](83353e0))
* [email protected] ([#2141](#2141)) ([670ba7c](670ba7c))

### Tests

* only repeat e2e tests on PRs ([#2124](#2124)) ([530c501](530c501))
* **storybook:** add PeerBandwidthTable.stories.js ([#2095](#2095)) ([c969c5e](c969c5e))

### Trivial Changes

* Pull transifex translations ([#2137](#2137)) ([2284453](2284453))
* Pull transifex translations ([#2140](#2140)) ([95d468b](95d468b))
@ipfs-gui-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 4.1.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants