Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Future of ipfd-ctl (for consideration) #149

Closed
daviddias opened this issue Mar 15, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Future of ipfd-ctl (for consideration) #149

daviddias opened this issue Mar 15, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels
P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up

Comments

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

daviddias commented Mar 15, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Taken from: ipfs/js-ipfs#556 (comment)

Satelite modules ipfsd-ctl vs ipfs-daemon vs ipfs-factory

We need a thing that lets us spawn nodes (js-ipfs and go-ipfs) easily, so that apps like orbit, our tests and benchmarks can switch between different combinations (js-ipfs, js-ipfs daemon + js-ipfs-api, go-ipfs + js-ipfs-api) without too much configuration.

This endeavor doesn't have to be part of "Improving Init", but it would be definitely useful to a lot of contributors, users and even for our testing.

Currently, we have:

ipfsd-ctl - spawns go-ipfs daemons and returns a js-ipfs-api instance to talk with them
ipfs-factory (not a module, just a tool within this repo) - spawns daemons from Node.js and the Browser.
ipfs-daemon - https:/haadcode/ipfs-daemon
ipfsd-ctl is the one that has more adoption.
@daviddias daviddias added the status/deferred Conscious decision to pause or backlog label Mar 15, 2017
@daviddias daviddias mentioned this issue Mar 20, 2017
Closed
22 tasks
@daviddias daviddias added status/ready Ready to be worked P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up and removed status/deferred Conscious decision to pause or backlog labels Oct 17, 2017
@thisconnect
Copy link
Contributor

Can this be closed?

@ghost ghost removed the status/ready Ready to be worked label Oct 23, 2017
@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

Sure :) It's not urgent anymore

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
P1 High: Likely tackled by core team if no one steps up
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@thisconnect @daviddias