Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 6, 2022. It is now read-only.

[WIP] feat/v0.1.0 #1

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

[WIP] feat/v0.1.0 #1

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

daviddias
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@daviddias daviddias self-assigned this Mar 21, 2018
@daviddias daviddias removed their assignment Apr 10, 2018
@vmx vmx added P3 - Low and removed P1 - High labels Nov 14, 2018
@danimesq
Copy link

danimesq commented Dec 5, 2019

@daviddias
Label says ready, but title yet is [WIP]

@daviddias daviddias removed the ready label Dec 7, 2019
@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

@DaniellMesquita this is waaay old code :) The ready label is a leftover from Waffle.io (Kanban), where ready was equivalent to backlog. The PR is still not ready.

@danimesq
Copy link

danimesq commented Dec 14, 2019

Why not prioritizing torrent in IPLD? Which one is more important than that?

@danimesq
Copy link

@daviddias

I'm projecting oTorrent app (formly omniTorrent), which would download the same file both from IPFS and from bitorrent, and also seeding both.
You really think torrent isn't the priority for IPLD? And I don't talk about piracy; Ubuntu ISO is a example of how torrents are useful.

@daviddias
Copy link
Member Author

@DaniellMesquita I absolutely believe that Torrents are important for IPLD. It is what IPLD is designed for, to create a way in which any kind of hash linked graphs can interop and through that, create a unifying language to resolve and query that data.

Previous work was:

You can track the progress of adding Torrent support at ipfs/js-ipfs#779 and it seams that the IPLD team intends to ship it soon (i.e. perhaps Q4) ipfs/js-ipfs#1893

@rvagg
Copy link
Member

rvagg commented Dec 6, 2022

closing for archival

@rvagg rvagg closed this Dec 6, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants