Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Grid buckets are not generated correctly with the newest version of PorePy #1

Open
jhabriel opened this issue Nov 29, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jhabriel
Copy link

In particular, loading the .geo files corresponding to the 3D benchmark, case 2, does not generate 1D (and 0D) fractures and mortars. This might be due to changes in the way physical lines and points are tagged/accessed.

@keileg keileg self-assigned this Nov 29, 2021
@keileg
Copy link
Owner

keileg commented Nov 29, 2021

Thanks. This is likely related to an update to tagging of physical lines and poitns in PorePy some time ago. I will try to look into it, but it take at least a few days.

@keileg
Copy link
Owner

keileg commented Dec 14, 2021

@jhabriel Did you end up modifying the files here, or using an older version of PorePy?

@jhabriel
Copy link
Author

@keileg: I did not manage to make this work, and I ended up using an older version of PorePy to make the 3D Geiger work. For the record, I also tried to pass constraints as an optional parameter for meshing the 3D geometry directly from the CSV. Unfortunately, this does not work either; PorePy complains when constraints are specified on the boundaries.

Bottom line, the only feasible solutions are: (1) specify the boundary lines and points in the new geo files manually, or (2) update the tags of the old geo files so it is compatible with the newest version of PorePy.

Due to limited time, I did not pursue any of the above solutions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants