-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Blog Post: Introducing JobSet #45759
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
a5abcb9
dafd037
536922a
95c884e
66759c0
4ef3d34
a6383c0
08224a2
d3d0821
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@ | ||
--- | ||
layout: blog | ||
title: "Introducing JobSet" | ||
date: 2024-04-02 | ||
slug: introducing-jobset | ||
--- | ||
|
||
**Authors**: Daniel Vega-Myhre (Google), Abdullah Gharaibeh (Google), Kevin Hannon (Red Hat) | ||
|
||
In this article, we introduce [JobSet](https://jobset.sigs.k8s.io/), an open source API for representing distributed jobs. The goal of JobSet is to provide a stable API for running/building APIs with AI/ML and HPC use cases in mind. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I struggle if we should define HPC.. What do you mean by "running/building APIs"? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think HPC is a known term, but I also don't understand the running/building APIs part. |
||
|
||
sftim marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
## Why JobSet? | ||
|
||
The Kubernetes community’s recent enhancements to the batch ecosystem on Kubernetes attracted ML engineers who have found it to be a natural fit for the requirements of running distributed training workloads. Large ML models (particularly LLMs) which cannot fit into the memory of the GPU or TPU chips on a single host are often distributed across tens of thousands of accelerator chips, which in turn may span thousands of hosts. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Please add some new lines. (I can only comment on this entire paragraph). There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. With this, I try to follow a newline per sentence. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Hmm this paragraph is only 2 sentences. Do we really need/want each sentence to be it's own paragraph? In the Kueue blog post they use paragraphs: https://kubernetes.io/blog/2022/10/04/introducing-kueue/ There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think it will be rendered the same. But if you have no new lines, people can only suggest the entire paragraph. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Localization teams ask for Markdown where the source is wrapped at around 100 characters. Please do that. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Updated so column width is max of ~100 chars (except in long links) |
||
|
||
As such, the model training code is often containerized and executed simultaneously on all these hosts, performing distributed computations which often shard both the model parameters and/or the training dataset across the target accelerator chips, using NCCL or XLA collective primitives like all-gather and all-reduce to perform distributed computations and synchronize gradients between hosts. | ||
danielvegamyhre marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
These workload characteristics make Kubernetes a great fit for this type of workload, as efficiently scheduling and managing the lifecycle of containerized applications across a cluster of compute resources is an area where it shines. It is also very extensible, allowing developers to define their own Kubernetes APIs, objects, and controllers which manage the behavior and life cycle of these objects, allowing engineers to develop custom distributed training orchestration solutions to fit their needs. | ||
|
||
However, as distributed ML training techniques continue to evolve, existing Kubernetes primitives do not adequately model them alone anymore. Furthermore, the landscape of Kubernetes distributed training orchestration APIs has become fragmented, and each of the existing solutions in this fragmented landscape has certain limitations that make it non-optimal for distributed ML training. | ||
|
||
On the one hand, the KubeFlow training operator defines custom APIs for different ML frameworks (e.g. PyTorchJob, TFJob, MPIJob, etc.); however, each of these job types are in fact a bespoke solution fit specifically to the target framework, each with different semantics and behavior. | ||
danielvegamyhre marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
On the other hand, the Job API fixed many gaps for running batch workloads, including Indexed completion mode, higher scalability, Pod failure policies and Pod backoff policy to mention a few of the most recent enhancements. However, running ML training and HPC workloads using the upstream Job API requires extra orchestration to fill the following gaps: | ||
|
||
1) **Multi-template Pods**: Most HPC or ML training jobs include more than one type of Pods. The different Pods are part of the same workload, but they need to run a different container, request different resources or have different failure policies. A common example is the driver-worker pattern. | ||
|
||
2) **Job Groups**: Large scale training workloads span multiple network topologies, running across multiple racks for example. Such workloads are network latency sensitive, and aim to localize communication and minimize traffic crossing the higher-latency network links. To facilitate this, the workload needs to be split into groups of Pods each assigned to a network topology. | ||
|
||
3) **Network setup**: Create and manage the resources (e.g. headless services) necessary to establish communication between the Pods of a job. | ||
|
||
4) **Startup sequence**: Some jobs require a specific start sequence of pods; sometimes the driver is expected to start first (like Ray or Spark), in other cases the workers are expected to be ready before starting the driver (like MPI). | ||
danielvegamyhre marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
JobSet aims to address those gaps using the Job API as a building block to build a richer API for large-scale distributed HPC and ML use cases. | ||
|
||
## How JobSet Works | ||
JobSet models a distributed batch workload as a group of Kubernetes Jobs. This allows a user to easily specify different pod templates for different distinct groups of pods (e.g. a leader, workers, parameter servers, etc.). | ||
|
||
It uses the abstraction of a ReplicatedJob to manage child Jobs, where a ReplicatedJob is essentially a Job Template with some desired number of Job replicas specified. This provides a declarative way to easily create identical child-jobs to run on different islands of accelerators, without resorting to scripting or Helm charts to generate many versions of the same job but with different names. | ||
|
||
![JobSet Architecture Diagram](jobset_diagram.png "JobSet Architecture") | ||
|
||
Some other key JobSet features which address the problems described above include: | ||
|
||
1) **Job Groups**: In modern data centers, hardware accelerators like GPUs and TPUs allocated in islands of homogenous accelerators connected via a specialized, high bandwidth network links. For example, a user might provision nodes containing a group of hosts co-located on a rack, each with H100 GPUs, where GPU chips within each host are connected via NVLink, with a NVLink Switch connecting the multiple NVLinks. TPU Pods are another example of this: TPU ViperLitePods consist of 64 hosts, each with 4 TPU v5e chips attached, all connected via ICI mesh. | ||
When running a distributed training job across multiple of these islands, we often want to partition the workload into a group of smaller identical jobs, 1 per island, where each pod primarily communicates with the pods within the same island to do segments of distributed computation, and keeping the gradient synchronization over DCN (data center network, which is lower bandwidth than ICI) to a bare minimum. | ||
|
||
2) **Automatic headless service creation, configuration, and lifecycle management**: pod-to-pod communication via pod hostname is enabled by default, with automatic configuration and lifecycle management of the headless service enabling this. | ||
Configurable success policies: JobSet has configurable success policies which target specific ReplicatedJobs, with operators to target “Any” or “All” of their child jobs. For example, you can configure the JobSet to be marked complete if and only if all pods that are part of the “worker” ReplicatedJob are completed. | ||
|
||
3) **Configurable failure policies**: JobSet has configurable failure policies which allow the user to specify a maximum number of times the JobSet should be restarted in the event of a failure. If any job is marked failed, the entire JobSet will be recreated, allowing the workload to resume from the last checkpoint. When no failure policy is specified, if any job fails, the JobSet simply fails. | ||
|
||
4) **Exclusive placement per topology domain**: JobSet allows users to express that child jobs have 1:1 exclusive assignment to a topology domain, typically an accelerator island like a rack. For example, if the JobSet creates two child jobs, then this feature will enforce that the pods of each child job will be co-located on the same island, and that only one child job is allowed to schedule per island. This useful for scenarios where, for example, we want to use a data parallel distributed training strategy to train a model using multiple islands of compute resources (GPU racks or TPU slices), running 1 model replica in each accelerator island, ensuring the forward and backward passes themselves occur within a single model replica occurs over the high bandwidth interconnect linking the accelerators chips within the island, and only the gradient synchronization between model replicas occurs across accelerator islands over the lower bandwidth data center network. | ||
|
||
5) **Integration with Kueue**: users can submit JobSets via [Kueue](https://kueue.sigs.k8s.io/) to oversubscribe their clusters, queue workloads to run as capacity becomes available, prevent partial scheduling and deadlocks, enable multi-tenancy, and more. | ||
|
||
## Example Use Case | ||
danielvegamyhre marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
One can install JobSet as follows: | ||
|
||
|
||
```bash | ||
VERSION=v0.4.0 | ||
kubectl apply --server-side -f https:/kubernetes-sigs/jobset/releases/download/$VERSION/manifests.yaml | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Pytorch training | ||
|
||
The following example demonstrates how to run distributed training using PyTorch. JobSet creates a Job with 4 pods and a headless service defined as pytorch. This allows for communication between the replicas. JobSet streamlines the creation of the headless service and allows for a single CRD for representing these jobs. | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
# Distributed training of a traditional CNN model to do image classification | ||
# using the MNIST dataset and PyTorch. | ||
apiVersion: jobset.x-k8s.io/v1alpha2 | ||
kind: JobSet | ||
metadata: | ||
name: pytorch | ||
spec: | ||
replicatedJobs: | ||
- name: workers | ||
template: | ||
spec: | ||
parallelism: 4 | ||
completions: 4 | ||
backoffLimit: 0 | ||
template: | ||
spec: | ||
containers: | ||
- name: pytorch | ||
image: gcr.io/k8s-staging-jobset/pytorch-mnist:latest | ||
ports: | ||
- containerPort: 3389 | ||
env: | ||
- name: MASTER_ADDR | ||
value: "pytorch-workers-0-0.pytorch" | ||
- name: MASTER_PORT | ||
value: "3389" | ||
- name: RANK | ||
valueFrom: | ||
fieldRef: | ||
fieldPath: metadata.annotations['batch.kubernetes.io/job-completion-index'] | ||
# Force python to not buffer output and write directly to stdout, so we can view training logs via `kubectl logs`. | ||
- name: PYTHONUNBUFFERED | ||
value: "0" | ||
command: | ||
- bash | ||
- -xc | ||
- | | ||
torchrun --rdzv_id=123 --nnodes=4 --nproc_per_node=1 --master_addr=$MASTER_ADDR --master_port=$MASTER_PORT --node_rank=$RANK mnist.py --epochs=1 --log-interval=1 | ||
``` | ||
|
||
Leader-Worker | ||
|
||
A popular paradigm for distributed workloads is the leader-worker design. Leader-worker entails having a leader pod, with a different template than workers, and worker pods. The leader must be started before the workers are started and if all the workers finish we can consider the workload complete and the overallworkload can be considered successful. | ||
|
||
a) Different pod templates for workers and leaders | ||
b) Success policies on the workers | ||
c) Startup policies | ||
danielvegamyhre marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
|
||
|
||
Example workload | ||
|
||
```yaml | ||
apiVersion: jobset.x-k8s.io/v1alpha2 | ||
kind: JobSet | ||
metadata: | ||
name: success-policy | ||
spec: | ||
# We want to start our JobSet in order with leader starting first and then workers starting | ||
startupPolicy: | ||
startupPolicyOrder: InOrder | ||
# We want to declare our JobSet successful if workers finish. | ||
# If workers finish we should clean up the remaining replicatedJobs. | ||
successPolicy: | ||
operator: All | ||
targetReplicatedJobs: | ||
- workers | ||
replicatedJobs: | ||
- name: leader | ||
replicas: 1 | ||
template: | ||
spec: | ||
# Set backoff limit to 0 so job will immediately fail if any pod fails. | ||
backoffLimit: 0 | ||
completions: 1 | ||
parallelism: 1 | ||
template: | ||
spec: | ||
containers: | ||
- name: leader | ||
image: bash:latest | ||
command: | ||
- bash | ||
- -xc | ||
- | | ||
sleep 10000 | ||
- name: workers | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. are there any tangible examples of this? I assume not if you're using bash here, but I find it odd this is abstract There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I agree, we should make the example more concrete. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The examples I know of require TPUs/GCP and I am not sure if we can do that for a general k8s blog post. So we decided to do simple options that don't require accelerators or lock you into a specific vendor. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think we can probably come up with a GPU based example and simply use fake node labels like "cloud.provider.com/gpu-label" instead of a vendor specific one There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe you can link to GKE related use cases as concrete examples? If @haircommander point is taking literal, we should show concrete usecases also. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. What do you think about that @sftim? Should we try to keep the post self contained? |
||
replicas: 1 | ||
template: | ||
spec: | ||
backoffLimit: 0 | ||
completions: 2 | ||
parallelism: 2 | ||
template: | ||
spec: | ||
containers: | ||
- name: worker | ||
image: bash:latest | ||
command: | ||
- bash | ||
- -xc | ||
- | | ||
sleep 10 | ||
``` | ||
|
||
danielvegamyhre marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. We prefer SVG:
Could you draw this as SVG instead? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Replaced png diagram with svg version |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please wrap the markdown at 100 or so (source) characters per line.
Once you've done that, I recommend squashing commits.