Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add the possibility to assume that multistream-select will succeed #1120

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

tomaka
Copy link
Member

@tomaka tomaka commented May 14, 2019

Fix #659

Does unfortunately not work and is quite hacky.

One unfortunate consequence (which is not a hack), is that we require the AsyncRead trait on write-only substreams, because we need to read whether the remote sent a negotiation success message. This is a small breaking change.

@ghost ghost assigned tomaka May 14, 2019
@ghost ghost added the in progress label May 14, 2019
@tomaka
Copy link
Member Author

tomaka commented May 14, 2019

I wanted to open this as a draft.

@tomaka tomaka closed this May 14, 2019
@ghost ghost removed the in progress label May 14, 2019
@tomaka tomaka deleted the fix-659 branch August 23, 2019 09:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add the possibility to assume that multistream-select will succeed
1 participant