Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should the MinGW binary packages contain static libraries? #11132

Open
madebr opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Should the MinGW binary packages contain static libraries? #11132

madebr opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@madebr
Copy link
Contributor

madebr commented Oct 9, 2024

Until now, all MinGW binary packages contain a dynamic dll and a static library.
Since the SDL project recommends using shared libraries, would it make sense to stop adding static libraries?
MinGW is the only platform for which we provide static libraries.

@slouken
Copy link
Collaborator

slouken commented Oct 9, 2024

Yes.

@madebr
Copy link
Contributor Author

madebr commented Oct 9, 2024

Is the yes an answer to the title, or the question in my post?

@slouken
Copy link
Collaborator

slouken commented Oct 9, 2024

Since the SDL project recommends using shared libraries, would it make sense to stop adding static libraries?

Yes. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants