forked from ethereum/go-ethereum
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement EIP-2937 #7
Closed
astarinmymind
wants to merge
17
commits into
lightclient:impl-eip-2718
from
technicallyty:impl-eip-2937
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
17 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c5f5359
Set Indestructable
technicallyty c47b7c9
lol spelling
technicallyty 78d4c8e
linter + opSuicide changes
technicallyty 7ea2b92
core/evm: more set_indestructible
technicallyty 316fbb2
moved to YoloV2 Instruction Set
e1cd990
added indestructible to EVM interpreter
2a6b6d3
implemented setindestructible
33bff9d
tests
technicallyty a7c7753
reimplemented if-else logic for opsuicide function
5b76eb2
added comments to TestEIP2937Indestructible tests
44de156
removed extraneous operation.selfdestructs flag
1e27782
revert unecessary change
technicallyty 3207dfe
reverted unnecessary syntax change
09b503f
eips.go: SETINDESTRUCTIBLE opcode must be the first byte
e957142
blockchain_test.go: add test for calling SETINDESTRUCTIBLE opcode whe…
24b98bd
revert irrelevant lint change
ddc61d9
eips.go: added comment that SetIndestructible must be the first byte
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this highlights the commens I made on FEM about the EIP: it's far too vaguely specified. In this case, it appears that executing this sequence:
B
.B
doesset-indesructible
as the first op.B
calls onC
C
does selfdestruct, but is prevented, because the flag was stickified fromB
.This implementation seems based on the
static
mode, which is meant to be 'sticky' -- following along any child scopes.I don't interpret the EIP to have the same semantics, though