-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 516
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make it easier to collect info for new devices #2419
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
make-all
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 20, 2024
Log product id and QueryThingsDataModel result if cloud is available. Issue #2419
make-all
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 20, 2024
Because the QueryThingsDataModel comes through as a string attribute on the json response rather than actual json data, we need to parse and reformat it to have it readable. Actually we probably want to condense it with custom formatting, but as a first step use the json features in Python. Issue #2419
make-all
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2024
make-all
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2024
make-all
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2024
make-all
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2024
Since the QueryThingsDataModel API is not working with the QR auth, try the GetDeviceSpecificationAndAttribute API call instead. This gives the most important info, but sometimes does not match the local protocol where enum values differ between cloud and local representation, and is often missing some diagnostic dps. Issue #2419
make-all
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2024
As the result is the same with both functions, revert to the preferred one for future reference, and disable the logging code that unsuccessfully tried to use it. - device: add an asyncio.sleep to the async generator so that it is async on every iteration. Issue #2419
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description
Now that an iot.tuya.com account is no longer needed to get local keys, users do not have a good source of info for dps info for new devices. This has led to a regression in quality of reports, which often don't contain the needed enum/integer range info, and sometimes not even dp ids, making the report useless.
Steps to reproduce
Expected behaviour
Now that cloud functionality is available, we could try to pull in all the info needed and log it, so we just need to send users to the log file for gathering info.
Additional context
No response
Confirmation
I am sure this is a bug, or improvement that is well enough described that it can be implemented
If this is for a specific device, the device config is mentioned above, or diagnostics are included.
This is not requesting addition of a new device
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: