Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I dislike the "condensed" font for titles. #204

Open
jyasskin opened this issue Dec 9, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

I dislike the "condensed" font for titles. #204

jyasskin opened this issue Dec 9, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@jyasskin
Copy link
Contributor

jyasskin commented Dec 9, 2019

https:/martinthomson/i-d-template/blob/master/v3.css selects the "Cabin Condensed" font for section titles. I find the narrow letters hard to read and would prefer a normal width font instead.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Owner

Hmm, I really like condensed fonts for headings.

Aside from a personal preference for condensed fonts, long headings are very common in drafts and RFCs and a narrower rendering helps keep things on one line.

Try tweaking the heading font in HTTP/3 to use Lato. That's a font that I almost selected (you can get semi-bold from the site, note that Google fonts don't have that variant). That pushes the title onto two lines. You can reduce font size to allow for more space; changes cascade from there.

The previous version used Roboto Condensed, which I decided against this time as it was both more narrow and used shapes that I found to be inconsistent with the body text.

Ideally there would be something fairly neutral, but only slightly wider on the whole. I couldn't find that font. If you have a suggestion, please offer one.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Owner

I know that this is unlikely to be better, but I'm considering https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Sofia+Sans+Semi+Condensed/about as an alternative. Still condensed, but only by half.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants