chore: joiner config entity property

[carlos-r-l-rodrigues]

What:

• promote entity as a property of joiner config relashionships
• defineLink - forward arguments on field aliases and small fixes

Breaking Change:

• rename Customer module Address related methods to CustomerAddress (e.g: listCustomerAddress)

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
medusa-dashboard	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Sep 11, 2024 9:10am

6 Skipped Deployments

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
api-reference	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)			Sep 11, 2024 9:10am
api-reference-v2	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 11, 2024 9:10am
docs-ui	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 11, 2024 9:10am
docs-v2	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 11, 2024 9:10am
medusa-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 11, 2024 9:10am
resources-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Sep 11, 2024 9:10am

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 999f447

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[adrien2p]

LGTM, do you think we should make the entity required? It will always refers to a type in the graphql in theory (even though not in the db) wdyt?

[carlos-r-l-rodrigues]

LGTM, do you think we should make the entity required? It will always refers to a type in the graphql in theory (even though not in the db) wdyt?

I believe we can keep it optional, that way it is still possible to link a Module to other directly. Suppose module X have 10 entities containing field z_id, 1 single link from X to module Z would be enough.