Synteny analysis #1386
Merged
Synteny analysis #1386
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
meren
requested changes
Mar 28, 2020
…() and added sanity check for window size being too large
|
I think a single run.info that mentions the output file path would be enough. The line above is redundant with that information :) |
meren
reviewed
Mar 29, 2020
|
Thanks for all the changes, @mschecht! These will be in |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi Meren,
I added tests for
anvi-analyze-syntenytorun_all_tests.shand reviewed the code ofsynteny.py, let me know if you have any suggestions.Cheers,
Matt