[protobuf] protobuf v3.13.0

[jozefizso]

Update to Protocol Buffers v3.13.0
https:/protocolbuffers/protobuf/releases/tag/v3.13.0

[PhoebeHui]

Thanks for the PR!

[BillyONeal]

/azp run

[azure-pipelines]

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

[BillyONeal]

The arm-uwp failures look legitimate...

[jozefizso]

The build arm_uwp failed because of:

-- Downloading https:/protocolbuffers/protobuf/archive/fde7cf7358ec7cd69e8db9be4f1fa6a5c431386a.tar.gz...
-- Extracting source D:/downloads/protocolbuffers-protobuf-fde7cf7358ec7cd69e8db9be4f1fa6a5c431386a.tar.gz
-- Applying patch fix-uwp.patch
-- Applying patch fix-android-log.patch
-- Applying patch fix-static-build.patch
-- Using source at D:/buildtrees/protobuf/src/a5c431386a-c9deea9e31.clean
CMake Error at ports/protobuf/portfile.cmake:22 (message):
  Cross-targetting protobuf requires the x86-windows protoc to be available.
  Please install protobuf:x86-windows first.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  scripts/ports.cmake:79 (include)

I'm not sure what to do here. When I build the protoc:x86-windows first and protoc:arm_uwp second, it works.

[BillyONeal]

I'm not sure what to do here. When I build the protoc:x86-windows first and protoc:arm_uwp second, it works.

CI currently installs "protobuf:x86-windows" first to make this work:

vcpkg/scripts/azure-pipelines/test-modified-ports.ps1

Lines 98 to 102 in c3f69d4

	# WORKAROUND: the x86-windows flavors of these are needed for all cross-compilation, but they are not auto-installed.
	# Install them so the CI succeeds:
	if ($Triplet -in @('x64-uwp', 'arm64-windows', 'arm-uwp')) {
	.\vcpkg.exe install protobuf:x86-windows boost-build:x86-windows sqlite3:x86-windows @commonArgs
	}

Perhaps that was split into "protoc" instead and that wasn't updated?

[PhoebeHui]

It pass after rerun, and I noticed that protobuf:x86-windows installed successfully, and protobuf:arm_uwp as well.

[BillyONeal]

It pass after rerun, and I noticed that protobuf:x86-windows installed successfully, and protobuf:arm_uwp as well.

Oh great, flaky ports :(. Oh well I guess.

@jozefizso Thanks for your contribution!