Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Debug Info v2 #151

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Debug Info v2 #151

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

devhawk
Copy link
Contributor

@devhawk devhawk commented Jun 26, 2022

This is a draft PR for the updated Debug Info used by the Neo Debugger Storage Schema Preview.

Changes are not expected, but until the storage schema work is out of preview, this PR will stay in draft status.

the possibility of a name collision since '''#''' is not a supported identifier character in most
programming languages.

The Version 2 type model includes six concrete ContractTypes.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need to add a mechanism to encode Iterators - probably as an intrinsic type (i.e. #Iterator).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, there is already support for iterator via #Interop

@ixje
Copy link
Contributor

ixje commented May 10, 2023

What is it we are waiting for for this to be merged?

@roman-khimov
Copy link
Contributor

Can't tell anything about the "draft" status of it (maybe there are some changes planned), but I'd say it should be a new NEP replacing the old one. That's exactly why we have "Replaces" and "Superseded-By" in NEPs. And then compilers could be compatible with NEP-19 or with new NEP-XYZ.

@ixje
Copy link
Contributor

ixje commented May 11, 2023

apparently it's waiting to be updated after #160 is accepted

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants