-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 270
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: add interfaces and proxy routes directly from ligolo. #60
Comments
adding additional info as I am interested in developing this feature and would request your feedback before coding:
|
Good idea. For Windows, the tun interface is automatically created, but not for Linux. I will implement this functionality soon. |
Thanks a lot! (Great talk also 👍) |
This would be great to fully automate the proxying instead of having to type in manually 3 commands each time :) |
Implemented in Ligolo-ng v0.6! |
Hi! Just discovered Ligolo, it's an excellent tool!
the tool is so useful I only have one feature i'd like:
automatically create tunnels and routing from the tool.
feature description:
let's imagine I have an agent with this interface:
if i'd run the new command
it would do under the hood:
sudo ip tuntap add user kali mode tun ligolo192_168_45_0 sudo ip link set ligolo192_168_45_0 up sudo ip route add 192.168.45.0/24 dev ligolo192_168_45_0 tunnel_start --tun ligolo192_168_45_0
caveats
I don't know how complex it would be to create this feature and integrate it to the tool.
It would require Sudo elevation of privilege from with ligolo to set interfaces (run elevated sub-process?)
I don't have knowledge in Go (yet!) and I'm pretty busy these next months, otherwise I would have tried for a pull request.
And I think it's more polite to ask feedback for a new feature to the app's creator ;)
By the way, I'm curious, where does the name "ligolo" comes from?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: