Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add usefull boundary actions for switch workspace when there is no window to be focused #433

Closed
3 tasks done
vitusli opened this issue Aug 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
3 tasks done
Labels
issue-template-ignored The issue will be ignored. The issue is most likely a duplicate or covered in docs

Comments

@vitusli
Copy link

vitusli commented Aug 19, 2024

Hi! Since I am not allowed to disable SIP on my working computer I checked out Aerospace which is such a pleasure to read through the docs. Thanks for this amazing work.

I love having dedicated boundary actions in your the aerospace config. In Yabai I had to set them up with || operators (#278) which works fine: when I come to the right boundary of my workspace and there is no next window to focus my WM focuses the next workspace. Same for upper direction: if there is no upper window it focusses the next monitor. I love this feature and want to suggest additional boundary actions for the use case mentioned above.

focus (left|right) --boundaries workspace --boundary-action workspace (prev|next)
focus (down|up) --boundaries all-monitors-outer-frame --boundary-action focus-monitor (prev|next)

I have read many issues and could not find a solution for this even though I found many others. I started with Aerospace in the morning and brought it pretty far with docs + this repo.

Checklist

aerospace CLI client version: 0.14.2-Beta 0cb8dbdfc5ee73b8cbc200f175f467ebead55201
AeroSpace.app server version: 0.14.2-Beta 0cb8dbdfc5ee73b8cbc200f175f467ebead55201
@nikitabobko
Copy link
Owner

Please don't ignore the checklist in the issue template

I won't be adding new boundaries-actions since it significantly complicates the CLI. The feature you're asking is going to be covered by #278

@nikitabobko nikitabobko added the issue-template-ignored The issue will be ignored. The issue is most likely a duplicate or covered in docs label Aug 19, 2024
@vitusli
Copy link
Author

vitusli commented Aug 22, 2024

Sorry, fully understand. I tried to put as much of the needed informationen from the checklist into the text but added now the checklist. Thanks for the fast response.

I solved this basically by using different 'modes' for tiling and accordion layout.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
issue-template-ignored The issue will be ignored. The issue is most likely a duplicate or covered in docs
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants