Node.js Foundation Technical Steering Committee (TSC) Meeting 2019-05-29 #713
Comments
|
Some of us will be traveling to Berlin. I propose to cancel. |
|
+1 to cancelling, I don't think there is anything new/urgent this week and as @mcollina mentioned many people will be travelling at this time (myself included). |
|
I'm good with canceling but I'd also like us to take this opportunity to push forward the two items on the agenda (not counting the standing items). There's no need for a meeting to do this stuff, but there is a need for TSC involvement. I'm going to put what I think is a decent way forward for each of those items in subsequent comments. |
|
For nodejs/node#26418, @sam-github seems to have clear ideas and definite opinions about the way that disagreement should be resolved, if not about what that resolution will ultimately look like. Sam, would you be willing to take an action item to review the most recent few comments, and formulate a way forward? That could be proposing "let's do X" and then seeing if you can get buy-in on X from @BridgeAR and @mscdex, modifying X as necessary. Or it could be not having a preconceived solution X and reaching out directly and privately (email?) to @mscdex and @BridgeAR to try to work something out that is agreeable to both parties. Or whatever you like. Just as long as something is being done to inch it towards a resolution one way or the other. The alternatives, as I see it, are to hold a TSC vote, or simply close the issue. I'm OK with a vote if we think we're at an intractable impasse. In that case, I guess the action item is to cajole TSC members who haven't participated in the vote yet to do so (even if it's just to explicitly abstain). In any event, can we assign that to you? |
|
For #707, I think we should approve the times @ChALkeR has calculated as best/most-fair/etc. TL;DR: If you're a TSC member, 👍 this comment to approve UTC 15 16 19. Use 👎 if you think those times are bad/unfair for the TSC as a whole, but please leave a comment/show your work. Use 😕if you don't have an opinion but trust everyone else to figure it out. My take: @ChALkeR has done great work extending the workable-but-simplistic algorithm that we used to use into something a fair bit more sophisticated. This is a hard problem and whatever time slots we choose, there will be issues. I'm confident that the ones he's suggesting are among the least problematic. I would encourage rubber-stamping this and dissuade people from proposing alternatives without doing a lot of looking into the factors that go into this. This is deceptively tricky stuff and I know I used to get frustrated after spending a lot of time looking at things, only to have people drive-by with suggestions that weren't thought through. |
|
No objections so cancelling the meeting for tomorrow. |
Time
UTC Wed 29-May-2019 16:00 (04:00 PM):
Or in your local time:
Links
Agenda
Extracted from tsc-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.
nodejs/node
nodejs/TSC
Invited
Observers/Guests
Notes
The agenda comes from issues labelled with
tsc-agendaacross all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.Joining the meeting
Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/611357642
Regular password
Public participation
We stream our conference call straight to YouTube so anyone can listen to it live, it should start playing at https://www.youtube.com/c/nodejs+foundation/live when we turn it on. There's usually a short cat-herding time at the start of the meeting and then occasionally we have some quick private business to attend to before we can start recording & streaming. So be patient and it should show up.
Many of us will be on IRC in #node-dev on Freenode if you'd like to interact, we have a Q/A session scheduled at the end of the meeting if you'd like us to discuss anything in particular. @nodejs/collaborators in particular if there's anything you need from the TSC that's not worth putting on as a separate agenda item, this is a good place for that.
Invitees
Please use the following emoji reactions in this post to indicate your
availability.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: