-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restore from increment causes mysqld to segault #10
Comments
I ran into this exact issue and could not find any solutions anywhere online other than "submit a bug report," which was less than inspiring because the process of installing a development version of MariaDB with debug symbols is no light undertaking. So, after several painful days of trial and error I'm happy to share my solution to prevent headaches for anyone else out there struggling with the same obscure issue. In my case, there was a single table causing all the problems, and it had its ROW_FORMAT set to COMPRESSED. Apparently MariaDB is getting ready to deprecate this feature, so I guess they're not attending to its nuances very carefully over in mariabackup development, hence the obscure bug. As soon as I changed that table with:
The crashes stopped happening during incremental backups. Keep in mind that this assumes your default row format is set to dynamic, as per the new default guidelines for any version of MariaDB >= 10.2.2. If you need to find which tables are set to compressed, try:
|
Creating the issue here because I'm not sure where else to ask for assistance.
I've been trying all day to test my backups and I want to restore my maria instance from its incrementals. I first run
mariabackup --prepare --target-dir base/'2021-11-25_23-00-01'/backup/
, the preparation works. However, when I try and prepare the first incremental backup I get this stack trace:I'm using kubernetes to run the maria instance and I've tried to create a duplicate environment to restore and I've tried running the prepare directly on the host with the same results. This leads me to believe that there is an issue with the incremental. Any help/guidance on this will be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: