[PRE REVIEW]: pudu: A Python library for agnostic feature selection and explainability of Machine Learning classification and regression problems.

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @enricgrau (Enric Grau-Luque)
Repository: https:/pudu-py/pudu
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: 0.3.0
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @hbaniecki, @aksholokhov
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cacb5b6520209b0c940bf46638df251d"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cacb5b6520209b0c940bf46638df251d/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cacb5b6520209b0c940bf46638df251d/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/cacb5b6520209b0c940bf46638df251d)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @enricgrau. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@enricgrau if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: paper

[editorialbot]

Couldn't check the bibtex because branch name is incorrect: paper

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot set main as branch+

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot set main as branch

[editorialbot]

Done! branch is now main

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot check repository

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.88  T=0.11 s (761.3 files/s, 280048.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JavaScript                      15           2433           2497           9214
HTML                            19           1540             54           7508
SVG                              1              0              0           2671
Python                          18            597            772           1206
CSS                              4            185             35            762
XML                              1              0              2            717
TeX                              1             18              0            350
reStructuredText                12            161            106            293
YAML                             9             31             47            228
Markdown                         5             58              0            145
TOML                             1              0              1              3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            86           5023           3514          23097
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


gitinspector failed to run statistical information for the repository

[editorialbot]

Wordcount for paper.md is 1054

[enricgrau]

@editorialbot @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
I've looked through the list of available reviewers. I'd like to suggest either of the following (Github users):

• sgbaird
• JHoelli
• FlorianK13
• mahfuz05062
  Thank you!

[editorialbot]

I'm sorry human, I don't understand that. You can see what commands I support by typing:

@editorialbot commands

[arfon]

@enricgrau - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We're currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.

For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!

[gkthiruvathukal]

Note to self: The comma-separated list of potential editors is: matthewfeickert, cMadan, vissarion.

👏🏾 - @cMadan Can you help to edit this JOSS submission? I will invite you now.

[gkthiruvathukal]

@editorialbot invite @cMadan as editor

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[gkthiruvathukal]

@cMadan Are you able to edit this submission?

[gkthiruvathukal]

@enricgrau Thank you for your submission to JOSS. We are currently facing a backlog of submissions in this track. Can you please follow up by looking at the list of editors to help me identify an editor that closely matches the topic of your submission? When you reach this page, please scroll down to Topic Editors. Please note that I am not asking you to suggest reviewers at this stage. Please simply list the GitHub IDs of prospective topic editors without using the @. Please reply to this thread by listing up to three GitHub IDs only (one per line).

[enricgrau]

@gkthiruvathukal Sure! Here is a list of editors I think may match the topic:

• jarvist
• matthewfeickert
• atrisovic

[arfon]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

👋 @gkthiruvathukal – I can grab this one.

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @arfon is now the editor

[arfon]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[arfon]

@aksholokhov @bbengfort @kmichael08 @hbaniecki – 👋 would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is pudu, A Python library for agnostic feature selection and explainability of Machine Learning classification and regression problems (https:/pudu-py/pudu)

As authors of papers already published in JOSS on a similar topic, we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out.

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Many thanks
Arfon

[hbaniecki]

Hi @arfon, I can review this submission in October.

[aksholokhov]

@arfon -- sure, I can do this review in early-mid October. Would this timing work for you?

[arfon]

🙇 that would work great. Thank you @hbaniecki and @aksholokhov!

[arfon]

@editorialbot add @hbaniecki as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@hbaniecki added to the reviewers list!

[arfon]

@editorialbot add @aksholokhov as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@aksholokhov added to the reviewers list!

[arfon]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #5873.

[arfon]

Thanks again @hbaniecki and @aksholokhov! See you over in #5873 where the actual review will take place.