[PRE REVIEW]: xesn: Echo state networks powered by xarray and dask

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @timothyas (Timothy Smith)
Repository: https:/timothyas/xesn
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: v0.1.4
Editor: @sneakers-the-rat
Reviewers: @Arcomano1234, @wiljnich
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/84a7fddace8425c95603b4f690a69896"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/84a7fddace8425c95603b4f690a69896/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/84a7fddace8425c95603b4f690a69896/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/84a7fddace8425c95603b4f690a69896)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @timothyas. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@timothyas if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.06 s (1049.2 files/s, 267278.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python                          24           1054            726           2964
TeX                              1            163              0           1699
Jupyter Notebook                 6              0           6019            840
Markdown                         3            107              0            545
YAML                            12             50             66            476
reStructuredText                 9            157            143            403
TOML                             2              4              0             34
DOS Batch                        1              8              1             26
JSON                             1              1              0             16
make                             1              5              7             11
Bourne Shell                     1              2              8              4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            61           1551           6970           7018
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    39	Timothy Smith
    21	timothyas

[editorialbot]

⚠️ An error happened when generating the pdf.

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 3240

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

[crvernon]

@editorialbot invite @jromanowska as editor

👋 @jromanowska - since we are wrapping up one of your other submissions, do you think you could take this one on?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[crvernon]

👋 @timothyas -There are a few things that you can take care of until I get a topic editor assigned to your submission:

• fix your paper.md file header. I believe you have an extra tab in front of your ORCID specifications. Once fixed, we should be able to compile from here.
• Please bring the word count of your paper to around a max of 1000 words. You can reference your documentation if needed from the paper.
• I don't see a paper.bib file with your bibliography present in your repo

Thanks!

[timothyas]

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

STITCHES: a Python package to amalgamate existing Earth system model output into new scenario realizations
Submitting author: @abigailsnyder
Handling editor: @observingClouds (Active)
Reviewers: @znicholls, @Zeitsperre
Similarity score: 0.7081

xeofs: Comprehensive EOF analysis in Python with xarray
Submitting author: @nicrie
Handling editor: @samhforbes (Active)
Reviewers: @DamienIrving, @malmans2
Similarity score: 0.7024

pyCSEP: A Python Toolkit For Earthquake Forecast Developers
Submitting author: @wsavran
Handling editor: @kbarnhart (Retired)
Reviewers: @nvanderelst, @mbarall
Similarity score: 0.7000

epyc: Computational experiment management in Python
Submitting author: @simoninirelland
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @zbeekman, @lorenzo-rovigatti, @amritagos
Similarity score: 0.6965

brains-py, A framework to support research on energy-efficient unconventional hardware for machine learning
Submitting author: @ualegre
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @wob86, @sisco0
Similarity score: 0.6939

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[timothyas]

@crvernon thank you for this!

• I think I fixed the tabbing issue in the paper.md header, it looks like editorialbot was able to compile the pdf.
• I am using a bibliography file located within the docs directory of the repo (at docs/references.bib). Will this work, or does it have to be paper.bib in the main directory of the repo?
• I will work on the wordcount, I didn't realize the word limit was strict.

[jromanowska]

Hi, @crvernon, thanks for the invitation, but I need to decline - I'm going away for holidays entire July. See you in August! 👋

[crvernon]

No problem, thanks @jromanowska!

[crvernon]

@editorialbot invite @sneakers-the-rat as editor

👋 @sneakers-the-rat - are you available to take this one on?

[editorialbot]

Invitation to edit this submission sent!

[timothyas]

@editorialbot generate pdf

@crvernon I was able to reduce the paper length dramatically from what it was, to ~1600 words. Please let me know if this is acceptable for JOSS. Thank you!

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

iharm3D: Vectorized General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamics
Submitting author: @bprather
Handling editor: @eloisabentivegna (Active)
Reviewers: @bgiacoma, @cpalenzuela
Similarity score: 0.6248

High-performance neural population dynamics modeling enabled by scalable computational infrastructure
Submitting author: @a9p
Handling editor: @emdupre (Active)
Reviewers: @richford, @tachukao
Similarity score: 0.6144

ACHR.cu: GPU-accelerated sampling of metabolic networks
Submitting author: @marouenbg
Handling editor: @lpantano (Active)
Reviewers: @wmegchel, @prasunanand
Similarity score: 0.6030

RHEA: an open-source Reproducible Hybrid-architecture flow solver Engineered for Academia
Submitting author: @lluisjofre
Handling editor: @diehlpk (Active)
Reviewers: @ctdegroot, @thomasgillis
Similarity score: 0.6014

starry_process: Interpretable Gaussian processes for stellar light curves
Submitting author: @rodluger
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @nespinoza, @j-faria
Similarity score: 0.5992

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[crvernon]

Thanks @timothyas - we will let the assigned topic editor and reviewers provide feedback before I ask for any further cuts. Thanks for knocking this out quickly!

@editorialbot generate pdf

@crvernon I was able to reduce the paper length dramatically from what it was, to ~1600 words. Please let me know if this is acceptable for JOSS. Thank you!

[sneakers-the-rat]

@editorialbot assign @sneakers-the-rat as editor

yes i would be happy to :)

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @sneakers-the-rat is now the editor

[sneakers-the-rat]

It looks like climate modeling is one of the major intended applications - maybe we can find one reviewer who is a climate modeler and maybe the other is a more general neural networks person? Are there any people the authors would like to recommend as reviewers?

Otherwise I see that @SarthakJariwala , @trontrytel , and @Zeitsperre might be a good fit here - are any of y'all interested in reviewing this package?

[timothyas]

Thank you @sneakers-the-rat! I can recommend Troy Arcomano (GitHub username: Arcomano1234) who has extensive experience with Echo State Networks and ML more broadly, applied to weather forecasting. His work is cited in the "Previously existing software" section of our paper.

[sneakers-the-rat]

That sounds perfect, @Arcomano1234 would you be willing to review this package?

[Arcomano1234]

Yes of course!

[Zeitsperre]

Hi there, thanks for thinking of me, but I've been alternating between vacationing and swamped at work for the last few months. Keep me in mind for other similar projects, though!

[timothyas]

Hi @sneakers-the-rat I just wanted to check in on this, is there anything that I can do to help move this review along? Thanks!

[timothyas]

Hello @sneakers-the-rat @crvernon or anyone, is there anything I can do to help move this review along? This paper has been sitting for a few months now.

Thank you!

[crvernon]

@timothyas let me reach out to @sneakers-the-rat internally and see if I can make contact. If not, I will reassign this to another editor and we will get it moving. Thanks!

[crvernon]

@editorialbot remind me in two days

[editorialbot]

Reminder set for @crvernon in two days

[timothyas]

Thank you @crvernon!

[sneakers-the-rat]

apologies for the delay, i was out of work for a bit and the return has been rocky. let's get this show on the road

[sneakers-the-rat]

@editorialbot add @Arcomano1234 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Arcomano1234 added to the reviewers list!

[sneakers-the-rat]

Searching in the db for a few more reviewers, I see @pitmonticone @wiljnich / @wiljnichepa and @bradyrx having previously volunteered as reviewers and having expertise in predictive modeling/climate/physical modeling - would any of you be willing to review this work?

[sneakers-the-rat]

@editorialbot remind me in one day

[editorialbot]

Reminder set for @sneakers-the-rat in one day

[wiljnich]

@sneakers-the-rat I am available and willing to review.

[sneakers-the-rat]

Fabulous! that's the two reviewers we need. since it's been a few months, can i have confirmation from @Arcomano1234 that he is still willing to review here? then let's start the review :)

[Arcomano1234]

Yes, I am more than happy to still review. I have a preliminary review and I have tried playing around with the code the last few months.

[editorialbot]

👋 @sneakers-the-rat, please take a look at the state of the submission (this is an automated reminder).

[editorialbot]

👋 @crvernon, please take a look at the state of the submission (this is an automated reminder).

[sneakers-the-rat]

@editorialbot add @wiljnich as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@wiljnich added to the reviewers list!

[sneakers-the-rat]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7286.