Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip unnecessary string format in RemoteStoreMigrationAllocationDecider when not in debug mode #16299

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

imRishN
Copy link
Member

@imRishN imRishN commented Oct 13, 2024

Description

Skip unnecessary string format in RemoteStoreMigrationAllocationDecider when not in debug mode

Related Issues

Master hot thread -

app//org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.decider.RemoteStoreMigrationAllocationDecider.getDecisionDetails(RemoteStoreMigrationAllocationDecider.java:196)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.decider.RemoteStoreMigrationAllocationDecider.canAllocate(RemoteStoreMigrationAllocationDecider.java:94)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.decider.AllocationDeciders.canAllocate(AllocationDeciders.java:94)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.allocator.LocalShardsBalancer.decideAllocateUnassigned(LocalShardsBalancer.java:980)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.allocator.LocalShardsBalancer.allocateUnassigned(LocalShardsBalancer.java:866)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.allocator.BalancedShardsAllocator.allocate(BalancedShardsAllocator.java:353)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.AllocationService.reroute(AllocationService.java:575)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.AllocationService.reroute(AllocationService.java:542)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.routing.allocation.AllocationService.disassociateDeadNodes(AllocationService.java:353)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.coordination.NodeRemovalClusterStateTaskExecutor.getTaskClusterTasksResult(NodeRemovalClusterStateTaskExecutor.java:123)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.coordination.NodeRemovalClusterStateTaskExecutor.execute(NodeRemovalClusterStateTaskExecutor.java:113)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.service.MasterService.executeTasks(MasterService.java:912)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.service.MasterService.calculateTaskOutputs(MasterService.java:464)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.service.MasterService.runTasks(MasterService.java:324)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.service.MasterService$Batcher.run(MasterService.java:228)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.service.TaskBatcher.runIfNotProcessed(TaskBatcher.java:215)
       app//org.opensearch.cluster.service.TaskBatcher$BatchedTask.run(TaskBatcher.java:257)
       app//org.opensearch.common.util.concurrent.ThreadContext$ContextPreservingRunnable.run(ThreadContext.java:891)
       

Check List

  • [ ] Functionality includes testing.
  • [ ] API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
  • [ ] Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

…er when not in debug mode

Signed-off-by: Rishab Nahata <[email protected]>
Copy link
Collaborator

@Bukhtawar Bukhtawar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc: @gbbafna @shourya035 for help with review

Copy link
Contributor

❌ Gradle check result for 60c167c: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

Signed-off-by: Rishab Nahata <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Gradle check result for 13627a0: SUCCESS

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 72.06%. Comparing base (20536ee) to head (13627a0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...decider/RemoteStoreMigrationAllocationDecider.java 83.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #16299      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     72.00%   72.06%   +0.05%     
- Complexity    64796    64846      +50     
============================================
  Files          5307     5307              
  Lines        302540   302543       +3     
  Branches      43708    43708              
============================================
+ Hits         217853   218021     +168     
+ Misses        66801    66634     -167     
- Partials      17886    17888       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@dbwiddis dbwiddis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM with a minor nit.

@gbbafna gbbafna merged commit 5d2d392 into opensearch-project:main Oct 14, 2024
42 of 43 checks passed
@gbbafna gbbafna added the backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch label Oct 14, 2024
opensearch-trigger-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
…er when not in debug mode (#16299)

Signed-off-by: Rishab Nahata <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 5d2d392)
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
dbwiddis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
…er when not in debug mode (#16299) (#16301)

(cherry picked from commit 5d2d392)

Signed-off-by: Rishab Nahata <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
dk2k pushed a commit to dk2k/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2024
dk2k pushed a commit to dk2k/OpenSearch that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport 2.x Backport to 2.x branch skip-changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants