Fix SegmentReplicationUsingRemoteStoreIT.testReplicaHasDiffFilesThanPrimary. #8863
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This test is failing in two ways. First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it. This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]>
mch2
requested review from
reta,
anasalkouz,
andrross,
Bukhtawar,
CEHENKLE,
dblock,
gbbafna,
setiah,
kartg,
kotwanikunal,
nknize,
owaiskazi19,
Rishikesh1159,
ryanbogan,
saratvemulapalli,
shwetathareja,
dreamer-89,
tlfeng,
VachaShah,
dbwiddis,
sachinpkale and
sohami
as code owners
Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #8863 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 71.12% 71.04% -0.08%
+ Complexity 57233 57213 -20
============================================
Files 4757 4757
Lines 269804 269807 +3
Branches 39454 39455 +1
============================================
- Hits 191898 191694 -204
- Misses 61698 61954 +256
+ Partials 16208 16159 -49
|
linuxpi
reviewed
Jul 25, 2023
dreamer-89
approved these changes
Jul 25, 2023
ankitkala
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2023
opensearch-trigger-bot bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2023
This test is failing in two ways. First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it. This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit e1a4125) Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Merged
6 tasks
mch2
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2023
This test is failing in two ways. First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it. This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit e1a4125) Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
mch2
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 26, 2023
This test is failing in two ways. First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it. This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener. (cherry picked from commit e1a4125) Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
sarthakaggarwal97
pushed a commit
to sarthakaggarwal97/OpenSearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 27, 2023
This test is failing in two ways. First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it. This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]>
baba-devv
pushed a commit
to baba-devv/OpenSearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2023
This test is failing in two ways. First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it. This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]>
kaushalmahi12
pushed a commit
to kaushalmahi12/OpenSearch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2023
This test is failing in two ways. First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it. This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kaushal Kumar <[email protected]>
brusic
pushed a commit
to brusic/OpenSearch
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 25, 2023
This test is failing in two ways. First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it. This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ivan Brusic <[email protected]>
shiv0408
pushed a commit
to Gaurav614/OpenSearch
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2024
This test is failing in two ways. First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it. This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener. Signed-off-by: Marc Handalian <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Shivansh Arora <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This test is failing in two ways.
First it fails when copying segments from the remote store and there is a cksum mismatch. In this case it is not guaranteed the directory implementation will replace the existing file when copying from the store. This change ensures the mismatched file is cleaned up but only if the shard is not serving reads. In that case we fail the shard so it is re-recovered rather than deleting the segment underneath it.
This test also fails with a divide by 0 in RemoteStoreRefreshListener.
Related Issues
Resolves #7643
Check List
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.