Fix: correctly named folders/files.

[dblock]

Description

Some leftovers from #439.

Refresh indexes to avoid flake in observability testing. Closes #495.

With #498 CI will fail without these changes.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[github-actions]

Changes Analysis

Commit SHA: e9e7a98
Comparing To SHA: 9eb3732

API Changes

Summary

NO CHANGES

Report

The full API changes report is available at: https:/opensearch-project/opensearch-api-specification/actions/runs/10357256800/artifacts/1803192608

API Coverage

	Before	After	Δ
Covered (%)	522 (51.13 %)	522 (51.13 %)	0 (0 %)
Uncovered (%)	499 (48.87 %)	499 (48.87 %)	0 (0 %)
Unknown	26	26	0

[github-actions]

Spec Test Coverage Analysis

Total	Tested
548	208 (37.96 %)

[DarshitChanpura]

ty @dblock !

[dblock]

@nhtruong I think the intent was to name partials _core, so not to confuse with partials we don't name test files this way. But maybe we should? If you think we should rename test files to match the APIs when it's _api, let's open a new issue and add a warning/error for misnamed files.

[nhtruong]

@nhtruong I think the intent was to name partials _core, so not to confuse with partials we don't name test files this way. But maybe we should? If you think we should rename test files to match the APIs when it's _api, let's open a new issue and add a warning/error for misnamed files.

_core is used as a namespace for operation groups on the root level. It's named differently from other namespace because it's omitted in the operation groups and in the clients. So instead of _core.bulk it's bulk operation group and is translated to client.bulk() on the clients instead of client._core.bulk()