Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

disputes: punishment on repeated dispute initiations (stale) #785

Closed
ordian opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

disputes: punishment on repeated dispute initiations (stale) #785

ordian opened this issue Aug 31, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@ordian
Copy link
Member

ordian commented Aug 31, 2022

As of paritytech/polkadot#5535, we don't disable validators for "against valid" disputes. But based on the number of disputes initiated by a validator within a session, we might want to disable it if it reaches a certain threshold. Since submitting more such disputes wastes the network bandwidth "for free".

We can also consider doing exponential slashing or slashing up to a certain number or what's suggested by @burdges in #790.

But disabling a validator would have a greater short-term impact since slashes are only applied after a bonding period.
@ordian ordian self-assigned this Aug 31, 2022
@ordian ordian mentioned this issue Sep 1, 2022
Open
18 tasks
@ordian ordian mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2022
Closed
11 tasks
@eskimor eskimor mentioned this issue Dec 5, 2022
Open
14 tasks
@Sophia-Gold Sophia-Gold transferred this issue from paritytech/polkadot Aug 24, 2023
@tdimitrov
Copy link
Contributor

tdimitrov commented Nov 15, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Considering #784, is this still relevant?
We ironed out the disabling part but what about the exponential slashing>

claravanstaden pushed a commit to Snowfork/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2023
@alistair-singh
Add bridge hub and statemint/e to e2e environment (paritytech#785)
c3bd614 
* make directory before copying

* added cumulus build step

* fixed path

* launch statemint and bridge hub

* fixed whitespace

* fixed versions

* add cumulus bin to envrc-template

* removed snowbridge

* generate bridge hub chain specs

* remove uneeded mutations in the spec

* use snowbridge cumulus fork

* removed sub beefy magefile command

* set version to snowbridge branch

* updated README

* removed commented out code

* updated node info

* update collator names

* changed para id's

* updated spec

* changed runtime version

* uncomment channel setup
@ordian ordian removed their assignment Dec 15, 2023
@Overkillus
Copy link
Contributor

Will be solved by the new disabling strategy. 0% slashes dispensed for validators voting invalid on valid will cause disablement. Disablement has opportunity cost which should be enough of deterrent.

@Overkillus Overkillus changed the title disputes: escalate punishment on repeated dispute initiations disputes: punishment on repeated dispute initiations (stale) Jan 17, 2024
helin6 pushed a commit to boolnetwork/polkadot-sdk that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2024
@dependabot
Bump cranelift-codegen from 0.85.1 to 0.85.3 (paritytech#785)
bee98fd 
Bumps [cranelift-codegen](https:/bytecodealliance/wasmtime) from 0.85.1 to 0.85.3.
- [Release notes](https:/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/releases)
- [Changelog](https:/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/blob/main/docs/WASI-some-possible-changes.md)
- [Commits](https:/bytecodealliance/wasmtime/commits)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: cranelift-codegen
  dependency-type: indirect
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>

Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
parachains team board
Status: Completed
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@tdimitrov @ordian @Overkillus @the-right-joyce