Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 15, 2023. It is now read-only.

Companion for #10808 (Transactional Layer Limit) #5232

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 2, 2022

Conversation

shawntabrizi
Copy link
Member

paritytech/substrate#10808

The with_transactional used inside the paras_inherent does not seem trivial to return an error.

This we are using the unchecked method here for backwards compatibility. Would be best to update this in the future if possible cc @drahnr

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. label Apr 1, 2022
@paritytech-processbot
Copy link

Waiting for commit status.

@paritytech-processbot
Copy link

Merge cancelled due to error. Error: Checks failed for 7c7f098

@ggwpez ggwpez added B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. D3-trivial 🧸 PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit. labels Apr 2, 2022
@ggwpez
Copy link
Member

ggwpez commented Apr 2, 2022

bot merge

@paritytech-processbot paritytech-processbot bot merged commit ad660e4 into master Apr 2, 2022
@paritytech-processbot paritytech-processbot bot deleted the shawntabrizi-transactional branch April 2, 2022 18:05
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
A0-please_review Pull request needs code review. B0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes C1-low PR touches the given topic and has a low impact on builders. D3-trivial 🧸 PR contains trivial changes in a runtime directory that do not require an audit.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants