-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restructure perfsonar-toolkit-security package #382
Comments
Look at adding a "-security" package to some of the individual packages that depend on these so people have an easy option to adding the security options they need. |
Once we have that, we should also then look if some of the sub-packages are worthy of use in the testpoint bundle (i.e. for securing httpd and memcached as these are used by the testpoint too). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It was decided we would like to further breakout the perfsonar-toolkit-security package instead more packages (maybe without toolkit in the name) that represent the individual functions so it is not all or nothing. This would give users more flexibility and make it easier for Ansible to manage firewalls. We probably ant packages for the following:
Will need to finalize how we organize these and may think of other things. We can still have a perfsonar-toolkit-security but it will depend on the sub-packages
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: