-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FastText segfaults during training of skipgram model #2333
Labels
bug
Issue described a bug
difficulty medium
Medium issue: required good gensim understanding & python skills
fasttext
Issues related to the FastText model
Comments
mpenkov
changed the title
FastText segfaults during training
FastText segfaults during training of skipgram model
Jan 15, 2019
Related to issue #2235 |
menshikh-iv
added
difficulty medium
Medium issue: required good gensim understanding & python skills
fasttext
Issues related to the FastText model
need info
Not enough information for reproduce an issue, need more info from author
labels
Jan 15, 2019
Not reproduced ( |
Dockerfile:
Save it in the current directory and run:
to reproduce the bug. You should see:
|
@menshikh-iv I think the Dockerfile above successfully reproduces the issue, so maybe we should remove the "need info" label from this ticket? |
menshikh-iv
removed
the
need info
Not enough information for reproduce an issue, need more info from author
label
Jan 19, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
bug
Issue described a bug
difficulty medium
Medium issue: required good gensim understanding & python skills
fasttext
Issues related to the FastText model
Given a data file:
the following code segfaults:
The result is the same for the develop branch and the 3.6.0 release.
Setting sg=0 in the constructor avoids the segfault, so the problem could be skipgram-related.
Running in gdb gives the following output:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: