fix(python): Change method op type hints to match dunder op type hints

[ts826848]

Type hints for operators were refined in #13635 0, but the refinements were generally not propagated to the method equivalents (pow() being the sole exception). This can result in equivalent expressions being treated differently by type checkers, especially if stricter settings are used that discourage/disallow the use of Any.

This commit changes the type hints for the method equivalents to match those for the operators. This should ensure resulting types are consistent regardless of whether one uses infix operators or their method equivalents.

This also has the side benefit of making the documentation a bit more consistent as the type hint more closely matches the stated type of the argument in the docstring.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.85%. Comparing base (b2550a0) to head (f842b15).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #18448      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.86%   79.85%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1496     1496              
  Lines      200364   200364              
  Branches     2867     2867              
==========================================
- Hits       160012   160005       -7     
- Misses      39806    39813       +7     
  Partials      546      546              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ts826848]

Whoops, looks like I forgot to run the pre-commit locally so I didn't catch the type errors before creating the PR. My mistake :/

Not sure what the best approach is for dealing with the mypy error. #type: ignoreing it is an option since the reduction is (approximately) equivalent to self & others[0] & others[1] & ... and that is well-typed, but I'm not certain there's a better approach. Thoughts?

I also notice the second argument to reduce is (self, *others) for and_ and (self,) + others for or_. Looks like #13635 changed on but not the other. Should I change or_ to match and_ in this PR or in a different one, if at all?