-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 235
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add validated data args in default factory #1475
Open
nix010
wants to merge
12
commits into
pydantic:main
Choose a base branch
from
nix010:add_validated_data_arg_to_default_factory
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
9d83ce6
Add validated data args in default factory
nix010 72fe9fb
fix error message depend on python version
nix010 d4bf43c
fix error message depend on python version
nix010 3245cc7
fix error message depend on python version
nix010 8be0096
fix error message depend on python version
nix010 0e0dbc3
Fix test fail in pypy and python<3.10
nix010 5e5c249
Fix test fail in pypy and python<3.10
nix010 94c1c6a
Merge branch 'main' into add_validated_data_arg_to_default_factory
nix010 ecbc7a9
Merge branch 'main' into add_validated_data_arg_to_default_factory
nix010 08fcdac
rework using bool flag for passing arg
nix010 8dd5ec2
Add comments
nix010 ed025e1
Merge branch 'main' into add_validated_data_arg_to_default_factory
nix010 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we add both branches here so that we can hopefully remove the hack in the long run?
See
pydantic-core/src/input/return_enums.rs
Lines 313 to 327 in 903a1a9
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we even need the function check here? I assume if we got to this point we know this is a callable bc we've matched on
DefaultFactory
...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, because there's a case ex:
default_factory=str
in python then thedefault_factory
here will not have__code__
and raise error.