Fix more links

python-attrs · Dec 28, 2021 · d528dd4 · d528dd4
1 parent fcfb5a6
commit d528dd4
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 3 changed files with 6 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/CHANGELOG.rst b/CHANGELOG.rst
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ Changes
 
  See the `new docs on comparison <https://www.attrs.org/en/stable/comparison.html>`_ for more details.
  `#787 <https:/python-attrs/attrs/issues/787>`_
-- Added **provisional** support for static typing in ``pyright`` via the `dataclass_transforms specification <https:/microsoft/pyright/blob/master/specs/dataclass_transforms.md>`_.
+- Added **provisional** support for static typing in ``pyright`` via the `dataclass_transforms specification <https:/microsoft/pyright/blob/main/specs/dataclass_transforms.md>`_.
  Both the ``pyright`` specification and ``attrs`` implementation may change in future versions of both projects.
 
  Your constructive feedback is welcome in both `attrs#795 <https:/python-attrs/attrs/issues/795>`_ and `pyright#1782 <https:/microsoft/pyright/discussions/1782>`_.

diff --git a/docs/conf.py b/docs/conf.py
@@ -10,7 +10,11 @@
 """
 
 linkcheck_ignore = [
+ # We run into GitHub's rate limits.
  r"https:/.*/(issues|pull)/\d+",
+ # It never finds the anchor even though it's there.
+ "https:/microsoft/pyright/blob/main/specs/"
+ "dataclass_transforms.md#attrs",
 ]
 
 # In nitpick mode (-n), still ignore any of the following "broken" references

diff --git a/docs/types.rst b/docs/types.rst
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Given the following definition, ``pyright`` will generate static type signatures
 
  - The ``attr.frozen`` decorator is not typed with frozen attributes, which are properly typed via ``attr.define(frozen=True)``.
 
- A `full list <https:/microsoft/pyright/blob/main/specs/dataclass_transforms.md#Attrs>`_ of limitations and incompatibilities can be found in pyright's repository.
+ A `full list <https:/microsoft/pyright/blob/main/specs/dataclass_transforms.md#attrs>`_ of limitations and incompatibilities can be found in pyright's repository.
 
  Your constructive feedback is welcome in both `attrs#795 <https:/python-attrs/attrs/issues/795>`_ and `pyright#1782 <https:/microsoft/pyright/discussions/1782>`_.
  Generally speaking, the decision on improving ``attrs`` support in pyright is entirely Microsoft's prerogative though.