[3.8] Update content for support of quarkus-oidc-token-propagation-(reactive) extensions

[rolfedh]

Cherry Picked from d14c8be
xref: #41938

[quarkus-bot]

Status for workflow Quarkus Documentation CI

This is the status report for running Quarkus Documentation CI on commit 9b60c8d.

✅ The latest workflow run for the pull request has completed successfully.

It should be safe to merge provided you have a look at the other checks in the summary.

[sberyozkin]

@rolfedh Are you going to manage these exclusions at the products docs level ?

[rolfedh]

@rolfedh Are you going to manage these exclusions at the products docs level ?

Hi @sberyozkin

From what I understand, @rsvoboda states that these extensions are now Tech Preview in both 3.8 and 3.14.

They also appear as Tech Preview for 3.8 on code.quarkus.redhat.com.

Based on our previous team discussions, Tech Preview extensions are supported: 3-13-SJ-MA-RS-Copy of QDOCS-660: Supported/unsupported extensions in the upstream>downstream documentation.

So, it seems like exclusions are no longer necessary on the 3.8 branch. Right?

Best,
Rolfe

[sberyozkin]

Thanks for the clarification @rolfedh. LGTM.

[sberyozkin]

LGTM.

@gsmet, please check and merge if it looks good to you

[rsvoboda]

Sorry, I merged already ...

[github-actions]

🙈 The PR is closed and the preview is expired.

[sberyozkin]

@rsvoboda OK, thanks for merging, I was not sure I could merge to 3.8

[rsvoboda]

I'm on triage call, I can discuss it with Guillaume if he is not happy that I merged this.

[sberyozkin]

Sure, I think Guillaume prefers to manage all the backports in general, but as long as he is aware, it should be fine I hope

[rsvoboda]

Well, the ideal case is to add triage/backport-3.8 label on the original PR and it will be cherry-picked during the backports/triage session. No need to do these individual PRs if the change is applicable to 3.8 stream.

@rolfedh can you set labels on PRs?

[rolfedh]

Well, the ideal case is to add triage/backport-3.8 label on the original PR and it will be cherry-picked during the backports/triage session. No need to do these individual PRs if the change is applicable to 3.8 stream.

@rolfedh can you set labels on PRs?

Sure, I can set the labels without any problem. However, I prefer doing the manual cherry-picks because I sometimes encounter merge conflicts or other issues that need inspection. How often does the backports/triage session happen?

[rolfedh]

Thank you both for the reviews and merges, @sberyozkin and @rsvoboda!

[rsvoboda]

How often does the backports/triage session happen?

There is no regular cadence, they are usually initiated when RHBQ discussions about the new version appear. With some plans about regular cadence, this shouldn't be an issue going forward. No promises though ;)