Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tune rocksdb for multi-cf setup #1490

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2024
Merged

Tune rocksdb for multi-cf setup #1490

merged 1 commit into from
May 1, 2024

Conversation

AhmedSoliman
Copy link
Contributor

Tune rocksdb for multi-cf setup

Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 1, 2024

Test Results

 99 files  ±0   99 suites  ±0   8m 24s ⏱️ -24s
 84 tests ±0   82 ✅ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
216 runs  ±0  210 ✅ ±0  6 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit b273b45. ± Comparison against base commit 6ea99f1.

@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman marked this pull request as ready for review May 1, 2024 14:24
@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman merged commit ec3b7bb into main May 1, 2024
5 checks passed
@AhmedSoliman AhmedSoliman deleted the pr1490 branch May 1, 2024 14:24
Copy link
Contributor

@tillrohrmann tillrohrmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good improvements 👏

Comment on lines -152 to -153
// we always need to enable atomic flush in case that the user disables wal at runtime
db_options.set_atomic_flush(true);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did this setting hurt performance?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants