Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(sink): do compaction in chunk for upsert sink #17174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 11, 2024

Conversation

st1page
Copy link
Contributor

@st1page st1page commented Jun 7, 2024

I hereby agree to the terms of the RisingWave Labs, Inc. Contributor License Agreement.

What's changed and what's your intention?

to make sure the optimization in #12250 is correct.
more context here.
#17154 (comment)

Checklist

  • I have written necessary rustdoc comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • I have added test labels as necessary. See details.
  • I have added fuzzing tests or opened an issue to track them. (Optional, recommended for new SQL features Sqlsmith: Sql feature generation #7934).
  • My PR contains breaking changes. (If it deprecates some features, please create a tracking issue to remove them in the future).
  • All checks passed in ./risedev check (or alias, ./risedev c)
  • My PR changes performance-critical code. (Please run macro/micro-benchmarks and show the results.)
  • My PR contains critical fixes that are necessary to be merged into the latest release. (Please check out the details)

Documentation

  • My PR needs documentation updates. (Please use the Release note section below to summarize the impact on users)

Release note

If this PR includes changes that directly affect users or other significant modifications relevant to the community, kindly draft a release note to provide a concise summary of these changes. Please prioritize highlighting the impact these changes will have on users.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the type/fix Bug fix label Jun 7, 2024
@st1page st1page requested review from StrikeW and hzxa21 June 11, 2024 05:39
// Making sure the optimization in https:/risingwavelabs/risingwave/pull/12250 is correct,
// it is needed to do the compaction here.
for chunk in
StreamChunkCompactor::new(stream_key.clone(), vec![chunk])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why we don't compact all chunks of an epoch for this case?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is a damaging operation that leads to a decrease in the latency of the sink. Therefore we do not do it by default.

Copy link
Contributor

@StrikeW StrikeW left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@st1page st1page added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 11, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 61bae13 Jun 11, 2024
29 of 30 checks passed
@st1page st1page deleted the sts/do_compaction_in_chunk_for_upsert_sink branch June 11, 2024 07:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type/fix Bug fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants