Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Req for comparison chart #123

Open
jkfnc opened this issue Jul 4, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Req for comparison chart #123

jkfnc opened this issue Jul 4, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@jkfnc
Copy link

jkfnc commented Jul 4, 2024

Would be good to have a comparison chart like one on this page https:/MeetKai/functionary

@tybalex
Copy link
Contributor

tybalex commented Jul 5, 2024

hi @jkfnc are you referring to this difference table?

@jkfnc
Copy link
Author

jkfnc commented Jul 5, 2024

Yes

@sanjay920
Copy link
Collaborator

we'll consider adding a similar chart in the future.
fwiw, rubra models are trained on all of those classes of function calls plus additional "chained" function calls where subsequent function calls depend on inputs/outputs to prior function calls - something we've seen only proprietary models capable of before rubra models

@jkfnc
Copy link
Author

jkfnc commented Jul 9, 2024

thanks, seeing the sample cookbook works great, are there plans to merge tools.cpp to llama.cpp mainstream ? if so , will nodejs requirement be removed ?

@tybalex
Copy link
Contributor

tybalex commented Jul 9, 2024

thanks, seeing the sample cookbook works great, are there plans to merge tools.cpp to llama.cpp mainstream ? if so , will nodejs requirement be removed ?

Yes, we plan to merge tools.cpp back to llama.cpp in the future. If that happened, the nodeJS requirement will likely be removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants