Update cargo #125237
Merged
Update cargo #125237
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/cargo cc @ehuss |
|
@bors r+ rollup=never p=1 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (7b06810): comparison URL. Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 2.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (primary -4.8%, secondary -1.2%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: 668.437s -> 668.851s (0.06%) |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…ease
Update `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config
This PR updates the diagnostics output of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config.
It's a simple and cost-less alternative to the build-script `cargo::rustc-check-cfg` instruction.
```toml
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(foo, values("bar"))'] }
```
This PR also adds a Cargo specific section regarding check-cfg and Cargo inside rustc's book (motivation is described inside the file, but mainly check-cfg is a rustc feature not a Cargo one, Cargo only enabled the feature, it does not own it; T-cargo even considers the `check-cfg` lint config to be an implementation detail).
This PR also updates the links to refer to that sub-page when using Cargo from rustc.
As well as updating the lint doc to refer to the check-cfg docs.
~**Not to be merged before rust-lang/cargo#13913 reaches master!**~ (EDIT: merged in rust-lang#125237)
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@fmease` *(feel free to roll)*
Fixes rust-lang#124800
cc `@epage` `@weihanglo`
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
…ease
Update `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config
This PR updates the diagnostics output of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config.
It's a simple and cost-less alternative to the build-script `cargo::rustc-check-cfg` instruction.
```toml
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(foo, values("bar"))'] }
```
This PR also adds a Cargo specific section regarding check-cfg and Cargo inside rustc's book (motivation is described inside the file, but mainly check-cfg is a rustc feature not a Cargo one, Cargo only enabled the feature, it does not own it; T-cargo even considers the `check-cfg` lint config to be an implementation detail).
This PR also updates the links to refer to that sub-page when using Cargo from rustc.
As well as updating the lint doc to refer to the check-cfg docs.
~**Not to be merged before rust-lang/cargo#13913 reaches master!**~ (EDIT: merged in rust-lang#125237)
``@rustbot`` label +F-check-cfg
r? ``@fmease`` *(feel free to roll)*
Fixes rust-lang#124800
cc ``@epage`` ``@weihanglo``
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 20, 2024
Update `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config
This PR updates the diagnostics output of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config.
It's a simple and cost-less alternative to the build-script `cargo::rustc-check-cfg` instruction.
```toml
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(foo, values("bar"))'] }
```
This PR also adds a Cargo specific section regarding check-cfg and Cargo inside rustc's book (motivation is described inside the file, but mainly check-cfg is a rustc feature not a Cargo one, Cargo only enabled the feature, it does not own it; T-cargo even considers the `check-cfg` lint config to be an implementation detail).
This PR also updates the links to refer to that sub-page when using Cargo from rustc.
As well as updating the lint doc to refer to the check-cfg docs.
~**Not to be merged before rust-lang/cargo#13913 reaches master!**~ (EDIT: merged in rust-lang#125237)
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@fmease` *(feel free to roll)*
Fixes rust-lang#124800
cc `@epage` `@weihanglo`
RalfJung
pushed a commit
to RalfJung/miri
that referenced
this pull request
May 22, 2024
Update `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config
This PR updates the diagnostics output of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config.
It's a simple and cost-less alternative to the build-script `cargo::rustc-check-cfg` instruction.
```toml
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(foo, values("bar"))'] }
```
This PR also adds a Cargo specific section regarding check-cfg and Cargo inside rustc's book (motivation is described inside the file, but mainly check-cfg is a rustc feature not a Cargo one, Cargo only enabled the feature, it does not own it; T-cargo even considers the `check-cfg` lint config to be an implementation detail).
This PR also updates the links to refer to that sub-page when using Cargo from rustc.
As well as updating the lint doc to refer to the check-cfg docs.
~**Not to be merged before rust-lang/cargo#13913 reaches master!**~ (EDIT: merged in rust-lang/rust#125237)
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@fmease` *(feel free to roll)*
Fixes rust-lang/rust#124800
cc `@epage` `@weihanglo`
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust-clippy
that referenced
this pull request
May 24, 2024
Update `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config
This PR updates the diagnostics output of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config.
It's a simple and cost-less alternative to the build-script `cargo::rustc-check-cfg` instruction.
```toml
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(foo, values("bar"))'] }
```
This PR also adds a Cargo specific section regarding check-cfg and Cargo inside rustc's book (motivation is described inside the file, but mainly check-cfg is a rustc feature not a Cargo one, Cargo only enabled the feature, it does not own it; T-cargo even considers the `check-cfg` lint config to be an implementation detail).
This PR also updates the links to refer to that sub-page when using Cargo from rustc.
As well as updating the lint doc to refer to the check-cfg docs.
~**Not to be merged before rust-lang/cargo#13913 reaches master!**~ (EDIT: merged in rust-lang/rust#125237)
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@fmease` *(feel free to roll)*
Fixes rust-lang/rust#124800
cc `@epage` `@weihanglo`
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang/rust-analyzer
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2024
Update `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config
This PR updates the diagnostics output of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint for Cargo new `check-cfg` config.
It's a simple and cost-less alternative to the build-script `cargo::rustc-check-cfg` instruction.
```toml
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(foo, values("bar"))'] }
```
This PR also adds a Cargo specific section regarding check-cfg and Cargo inside rustc's book (motivation is described inside the file, but mainly check-cfg is a rustc feature not a Cargo one, Cargo only enabled the feature, it does not own it; T-cargo even considers the `check-cfg` lint config to be an implementation detail).
This PR also updates the links to refer to that sub-page when using Cargo from rustc.
As well as updating the lint doc to refer to the check-cfg docs.
~**Not to be merged before rust-lang/cargo#13913 reaches master!**~ (EDIT: merged in rust-lang/rust#125237)
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@fmease` *(feel free to roll)*
Fixes rust-lang/rust#124800
cc `@epage` `@weihanglo`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
6 commits in 4de0094ac78743d2c8ff682489e35c8a7cafe8e4..0de7f2ec6c39d68022e6b97a39559d2f4dbf3930
2024-05-09 16:09:22 +0000 to 2024-05-17 16:54:54 +0000
check-cfglint config for theunexpected_cfgslint (Add specialcheck-cfglint config for theunexpected_cfgslint cargo#13913)ops::resolve(refactor: misc refactors forops::resolvecargo#13917)write_atomic(Preserve file permissions on unix duringwrite_atomiccargo#13898)r? ghost